- From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 02:04:51 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
For info; if anyone is tracking this work it'd be great if you could
keep an eye out for possible useful overlaps with RDF-based efforts...
Dan
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:47:33 -0800
From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>
To: WebDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Subject: FYI: Formation of Web Intermediaries (webi) WG
Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:48:14 -0500 (EST)
Resent-From: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf-announce/Current/msg10869.html
A new working group has been formed in the Applications Area of
the IETF. For additional information, contact the Area Directors
or the WG Chair.
Web Intermediaries (webi)
-------------------------
Current Status: Active Working Group
Chair(s):
Ian Cooper <icooper@equinix.com>
Mark Nottingham <mnot@akamai.com>
Applications Area Director(s):
Ned Freed <ned.freed@innosoft.com>
Patrik Faltstrom <paf@cisco.com>
Applications Area Advisor:
Patrik Faltstrom <paf@cisco.com>
Mailing Lists:
General Discussion:webi@equinix.com
To Subscribe: webi-request@equinix.com
In Body: (un)subscribe
Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/webi
Description of Working Group:
This working group will address specific issues in the world wide web
infrastructure (as identified by the WREC working group), by providing
generic mechanisms which are useful in several application domains
(e.g., proxies, content delivery surrogates).
Work items for this group will be:
1) An invalidation protocol to provide a strong cache coherence
mechanism while avoiding the latency penalty of validation, usable
in proxy as well as surrogate configurations.
2) An intermediate service discovery mechanism, consisting of:
a) An intermediary service description format, which describes what
services an intermediary or arbitrary group of intermediaries is
willing to provide, and
b) A discovery protocol for locating relevant service descriptions
within a single administrative domain.
Both components will take into consideration current practice,
related work in the IETF, and a reasoned set of requirements, which
will include the need to provide a reasonable alternative to
interception proxies.
Service discovery, and other issues pertaining to coordination between
multiple administrative domains are explicitly out of scope of this
group.
Protocols associated with the provisioning of value added services,
including the vectoring of adaptation requests to other devices, are
also out of scope for this group.
Finally, this group will only address application-level (e.g., HTTP)
intermediaries.
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2001 21:10:10 UTC