- From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 02:04:51 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
For info; if anyone is tracking this work it'd be great if you could keep an eye out for possible useful overlaps with RDF-based efforts... Dan ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:47:33 -0800 From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu> To: WebDAV WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org> Subject: FYI: Formation of Web Intermediaries (webi) WG Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:48:14 -0500 (EST) Resent-From: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf-announce/Current/msg10869.html A new working group has been formed in the Applications Area of the IETF. For additional information, contact the Area Directors or the WG Chair. Web Intermediaries (webi) ------------------------- Current Status: Active Working Group Chair(s): Ian Cooper <icooper@equinix.com> Mark Nottingham <mnot@akamai.com> Applications Area Director(s): Ned Freed <ned.freed@innosoft.com> Patrik Faltstrom <paf@cisco.com> Applications Area Advisor: Patrik Faltstrom <paf@cisco.com> Mailing Lists: General Discussion:webi@equinix.com To Subscribe: webi-request@equinix.com In Body: (un)subscribe Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/webi Description of Working Group: This working group will address specific issues in the world wide web infrastructure (as identified by the WREC working group), by providing generic mechanisms which are useful in several application domains (e.g., proxies, content delivery surrogates). Work items for this group will be: 1) An invalidation protocol to provide a strong cache coherence mechanism while avoiding the latency penalty of validation, usable in proxy as well as surrogate configurations. 2) An intermediate service discovery mechanism, consisting of: a) An intermediary service description format, which describes what services an intermediary or arbitrary group of intermediaries is willing to provide, and b) A discovery protocol for locating relevant service descriptions within a single administrative domain. Both components will take into consideration current practice, related work in the IETF, and a reasoned set of requirements, which will include the need to provide a reasonable alternative to interception proxies. Service discovery, and other issues pertaining to coordination between multiple administrative domains are explicitly out of scope of this group. Protocols associated with the provisioning of value added services, including the vectoring of adaptation requests to other devices, are also out of scope for this group. Finally, this group will only address application-level (e.g., HTTP) intermediaries.
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2001 21:10:10 UTC