- From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 14:02:57 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Graham Klyne wrote: > [freed from spam trap. -Ralph] > > Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 07:45:36 -0500 (EST) > To: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org> > From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> > Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010112124052.03f25460@pop.dial.pipex.com> > > The RDF Terminology and Concepts note are now on the web: > > http://public.research.mimesweeper.com/RDF/RDFTerminologyConcepts.html Thanks for that :-) This gives us a concrete target for pedantry and suggestions. Such as the following: "Web Resource" versus "RDF Resource" is not a distinction I care to make. We identify resources "to", "for" and "in" the Web, not "on" it: URIs have long allowed us to name so-called non-Web resources. For example: telephone numbers, Java interfaces, intellectual works / publications (ISBN, Handle etc), and the like can all be identified as RDF=Web resources, despite not being "on" the Web. By this I don't mean to claim that all W3C/IETF/etc documents that appeal to a notion of 'Resource' relating to URIs are consistent. Just that they should be, and that we shouldn't take as a goal the articulation of a distinction between 'Web' versus 'RDF' resources. Some related resources / context you might care to add to the doc: http://www.w3.org/Help/siteindex W3C site index / technology keywords http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/Weaving/glossary.html Glossary from 'Weaving the Web'. http://www.w3.org/WCA/ Web Characterisation Initiative (historical interest) http://www.w3.org/1999/05/WCA-terms/ Web Characterization Terminology & Definitions Sheet W3C Working Draft 24-May-1999 HTTP-NG Activity Statement (historical interest) http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP-NG/Activity.html http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-HTTP-NG-interfaces/ HTTP-NG Web Interfaces (an attempt to formalise our a notion of URIs, resources etc in terms of a distributed object type hierarchy). http://www.w3.org/Addressing/ Naming and Addressing: URIs, URLs, ... http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt -- URIs http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616.html -- for HTTP 1.1's notion of URI, 'resource', entity etc... hope this helps, Dan
Received on Friday, 12 January 2001 09:05:07 UTC