- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 17:05:46 -0000
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
"To whoever it may concern", I've noticed that the usage of <address> as set out in HTML 4.01 is rather ambiguous. The definition [1] says "details about the author", but the example contains date information as well... I take the example as being a normative extension to the definition. Anyway, what this implies is that <address> is metadata. So would it be better to use RDF? Of course...but you still want to see it inline sometimes. So use inline RDF? Exactly:- <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <address> <div> <dc:author> <a href=" mailto:sean@mysterylights.com">Sean B. Palmer</a> </dc:author> </div> <div> <dc:date>2001-01-04</dc:date> </div> </address> </rdf:Description> Triples:- mydoc.html --[rdf:Description]--> html:address html:address --> dc:author -> Sean B. Palmer dc:date -> 2001-01-04 Pretty obvious I suppose, but I wanted to say it anyway... The first person to point out my main inaccuracy gets a free off-list rant about using XHTML m12n to add RDF to XHTML :-) [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html40/struct/global.html#edef-ADDRESS Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer http://infomesh.net/sbp/ http://www.w3.org/WAI/ [ERT/GL/PF] "Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics." - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2001 12:06:06 UTC