- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 11:47:13 -0500
- To: tarod@softhome.net
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
There are two easy ways: 1/ Make literals be pairs of lexical values and datatypes. 2/ Make literals be data values. Neither of these ways presuppose any particular way of writing literals in either RDF/XML or ntriples. peter From: tarod@softhome.net Subject: Re: RDF speficiations (was RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot) Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 09:02:40 GMT > Peter F. Patel-Schneider writes: > > > > > > John is 23 > > > > > > I would have > > > > > > John is age1234 > > > age1234 type integer > > > age1234 value 23 > > > > > > Is that right? > > > > Well this is one way of implementing data types for literals. I, > > personally prefer one that does not have this ``triple bloat''. > > > > Could you propose another implementation that not supose breaking the > Sentence model? > > Thanks, > Marc
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2001 11:49:11 UTC