- From: Martin Lacher <lacher@db.stanford.edu>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:31:09 -0700
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, <andrei@derpi.tuwien.ac.at>
- Cc: <lobrst@mitre.org>, <gdm@empolis.co.uk>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> > 2 Another is "object layer" mapping which just encode XTM > graph as a RDF > > graph and semantic is stored implicitly in that graph. > > The query should contain statements for extracting semantic information > > such in F-Logic in the article > > ... > > tms:roleLabel->natural-resource; > > ... > > or semantic should be provided by inference engine > > > > But from the point of view of the article - to develop query > engine which > > can also include XTM resources into RDF > > both ways are suitable. The difference is only in queries. > Information is > > not lost. > > Not lost to a fully capable reasoner, such as a human. However, > it is lost > to an RDF (only)-capable agent. Yes, so far a human user who understands our mapping has to write a query to query both sources. Cheers, Martin
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2001 19:34:18 UTC