Re: Summary of the QName to URI Mapping Problem

On Friday, August 17, 2001, at 10:34  AM, Piotr Kaminski wrote:

> But how can you say that it's acceptable to consider different 
> QNames to
> be the same?  If I wanted them to be the same, then I would've 
> picked the
> same URI and local name.  If I didn't do that, what gives you 
> the right to
> merge them?

Well, assuming it's in an RDF document: the RDF spec.

--
[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]

Received on Saturday, 18 August 2001 21:45:52 UTC