RE: anonymous nodes

Then again, there's still something to be said for standards
in the interest of data portability and system interoperability;
and even though I'm less concerned with issues such as a 
standard query language for RDF or which ontologies win out
as the most used, etc. I still think that something as fundamental
as resource identity as it relates to serialization is something
that we should be able to trust the standard to define.

Cheers,

Patrick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stickler Patrick (NRC/Tampere) 
> Sent: 16 August, 2001 20:43
> To: ext Seth Russell; www-rdf-interest@w3.org;
> scranefield@infoscience.otago.ac.nz; sean@mysterylights.com
> Subject: RE: anonymous nodes
> 
> 
> > ... Think about it .. maybe
> > everybody's seeming obsession with these standards instead of 
> > making tools
> > is what is holding us back.
> 
> You may very well be right.
>  
> > Let the best tools win!
> 
> You're on!  ;-)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Patrick
> 
> --
> Patrick Stickler                      Phone:  +358 3 356 0209
> Senior Research Scientist             Mobile: +358 50 483 9453
> Software Technology Laboratory        Fax:    +358 7180 35409
> Nokia Research Center                 Video:  +358 3 356 0209 / 4227
> Visiokatu 1, 33720 Tampere, Finland   Email:  
> patrick.stickler@nokia.com
>  
>

Received on Thursday, 16 August 2001 13:46:53 UTC