- From: by way of <tolle@ics.forth.gr>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 10:32:55 -0400
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
[freed from spam trap -rrs]
Old-Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 16:52:57 +0300 (EEST)
From: Karsten Tolle <tolle@ics.forth.gr>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
cc: Vassilis Christophides <christop@ics.forth.gr>,
Alexaki Sofia <alexaki@ics.forth.gr>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0108091617490.28390-100000@sappho.ics.forth.gr>
Hello there,
recently I made some test with VRP[1] and I think there is an error in
www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema
at the end of the file we can read:
...
<rdfs:seeAlso resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema-more"/>
...
in this case the namespace of the attribute resource (for my
understanding) would be the namespace of rdfs. To avoid these problem the
w3c WG stated in 'RDF Issue Tracking':"ALL attributes must be namespace
qualified". I know this is not yet normative but in this case I think it
would be useful to change www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema to:
...
<rdfs:seeAlso rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema-more"/>
...
I also had a look to the file www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema-more, where we
can read:
... parseType="literal" ... (two times)
according to the RDF M&S specification I think it should be changed to:
... parseType="Literal" ...
Greetings
Karsten
[1] VRP - Validating RDF Parser www.ics.forth.gr/proj/isst/RDF/
__________________________________________________________________
Karsten Tolle
mailto:tolle@csd.uch.gr
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2001 10:34:29 UTC