- From: Graham Klyne <GK@dial.pipex.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 13:52:17 +0100
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: rdf interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
At 10:21 AM 9/29/00 +0100, Jan Grant wrote: >and loosely: > >P has a range of (a member of the union of A and B) > > A --[rdfs:subclassOf]-> anon:C > B --[rdfs:subclassOf]-> anon:C > P --[rdfs:range]-> anon:C > >(give anon:C a real URI if you prefer). > >Are there problems with this scheme? I like the approach. I don't know if it's a _problem_, but I don't think this actually allows one to validate OR infer much in an open-world environment. E.g. the above statements don't allow us to infer from: S --P--> O the truth or falsity of any of the following: O --rdf:type--> A O --rdf:type--> B O --rdf:type--> D Similarly, they don't allow us to validate a statement like: S --P--> O where O --rdf:type--> D I guess what it does tell us is that S --P--> O where O --rdf:type--> A or O --rdf:type--> B is definitely valid. #g ------------ Graham Klyne (GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Friday, 29 September 2000 09:50:05 UTC