W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2000

RE: Extracting and reifying RDF statements from XML

From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 13:18:31 -0400
To: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002b01c02582$4c038850$0201a8c0@ne.mediaone.net>

> On 22 september 2000 Jonathan Borden wrote:
> > This extractor outputs rdf:Statements.
> Nice! Our samples passed.
> > Interestingly, when the result of a transform is itself
> > transformed, the statements are reified, hence I call
> > this rdfExtractify.xsl
> I think rdf:Statement is axiomatic and should not be
> further reified. So reified RDF is invariant after such
> transformation (i.e. producing the same graph).

I must admit that I am only vaguely aware of the purpose of reification but
reading M&S 1.0 http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/#model

"Furthermore, the formal specification for reification is:

7. There is an element of Resources, not contained in Properties, known as
8. There are three elements in Properties known as RDF:predicate,
RDF:subject and RDF:object.
9. Reification of a triple {pred, sub, obj} of Statements is an element r of
Resources representing the reified triple and the elements s1, s2, s3, and
s4 of Statements such that
s1: {RDF:predicate, r, pred}
s2: {RDF:subject, r, subj}
s3: {RDF:object, r, obj}
s4: {RDF:type, r, [RDF:Statement]}

It seems to me that under [9], an <rdf:Statement> which is a triple, is what
is being reified. I am confused as to why you suggest that rdf:Statement
should not be further reified.

Jonathan Borden
The Open Healthcare Group
Received on Saturday, 23 September 2000 13:10:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:25 UTC