At 08:57 AM 9/20/00 +0100, McBride, Brian wrote: >So if we imagine that we have two resources s1 and s2 both of which >represent some statement S. Then any RDF statement >that was true of s1, would in fact be a statement about S and so >would also be true of s2. And vice versa, any true statement about >s2 would be true of S and would thus also be true of s1. A similar >argument applies to false statements about s1 and s2. I'm not sure I buy the premise here... Suppose we have s1 and s2, as you say, both modelling (representing) S. Then we may have different statements about the statement S attached to them: s1 --assertedBy--> "Brian" s2 --assertedBy--> "Graham" Further, consider that s1 and s2 may appear in different documents, covered by different digital signatures, so there are differences about the representations used, even though they represent the same statement. #g ------------ Graham Klyne (GK@ACM.ORG)Received on Wednesday, 20 September 2000 04:18:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:25 UTC