RE: discussion strawman: RDF Data Model Summary

I agree wholly with this view expressed by Brian.

#g

At 04:54 PM 9/8/00 +0100, McBride, Brian wrote:
> > Views on where (if anywhere) to go with this stuff gratefully
> > received. There are only so many hours in the day and having
> > opened the
> > book on RDF issue tracking (not to mention the XGraph scrapbook) I'm
> > wondering how much folk here would value a model-only doc...
>
>Speaking for myself, I would find a model only specification very useful,
>PROVIDED the result was a clarification of the model.
>
>We must ensure that we don't add to the confusion by having two documents
>telling different stories and folks not sure which to go by.  Any new
>document must be authoritative.  I'm not sure what that means in terms of
>w3c process.
>
>Brian

------------
Graham Klyne
(GK@ACM.ORG)