W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2000

RE: discussion strawman: RDF Data Model Summary

From: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 09:58:44 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: "McBride, Brian" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
I agree wholly with this view expressed by Brian.


At 04:54 PM 9/8/00 +0100, McBride, Brian wrote:
> > Views on where (if anywhere) to go with this stuff gratefully
> > received. There are only so many hours in the day and having
> > opened the
> > book on RDF issue tracking (not to mention the XGraph scrapbook) I'm
> > wondering how much folk here would value a model-only doc...
>Speaking for myself, I would find a model only specification very useful,
>PROVIDED the result was a clarification of the model.
>We must ensure that we don't add to the confusion by having two documents
>telling different stories and folks not sure which to go by.  Any new
>document must be authoritative.  I'm not sure what that means in terms of
>w3c process.

Graham Klyne
Received on Monday, 11 September 2000 09:25:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:25 UTC