- From: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 09:58:44 +0100
- To: "McBride, Brian" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
I agree wholly with this view expressed by Brian. #g At 04:54 PM 9/8/00 +0100, McBride, Brian wrote: > > Views on where (if anywhere) to go with this stuff gratefully > > received. There are only so many hours in the day and having > > opened the > > book on RDF issue tracking (not to mention the XGraph scrapbook) I'm > > wondering how much folk here would value a model-only doc... > >Speaking for myself, I would find a model only specification very useful, >PROVIDED the result was a clarification of the model. > >We must ensure that we don't add to the confusion by having two documents >telling different stories and folks not sure which to go by. Any new >document must be authoritative. I'm not sure what that means in terms of >w3c process. > >Brian ------------ Graham Klyne (GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Monday, 11 September 2000 09:25:31 UTC