- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 16:27:30 -0400
- To: "James Tauber" <JTauber@bowstreet.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
James Tauber wrote: > > So the mapping rule is (roughly) > > when you hit a > > rdf:Description[@about]/*[@rdf:resource] > > then add the triple > > ../@about , name() , @rdf:resource > > This looks a lot more like XSLT than anything else to me. > > I believe that most of the syntax of the RDF M&S could be expressed in > similar fashion and FURTHERMORE that all the XML documents I have that are > RDF-like but not quite (because they use ref instead of rdf:resource, for > example) could be mapped to triples just as easily. Isn't this the essence of the RDF simplications (Sergey Melnik & TimBL)? Sergey proposes that any element that doesn't contain an "rdf:instance" attribute becomes a Property. Jonathan Borden The Open Healthcare Group http://www.openhealth.org
Received on Friday, 8 September 2000 16:37:47 UTC