W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2000

RE: discussion strawman: RDF Data Model Summary

From: McBride, Brian <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 16:54:44 +0100
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F2393BE@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@w3.org>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Views on where (if anywhere) to go with this stuff gratefully
> received. There are only so many hours in the day and having 
> opened the
> book on RDF issue tracking (not to mention the XGraph scrapbook) I'm
> wondering how much folk here would value a model-only doc...

Speaking for myself, I would find a model only specification very useful,
PROVIDED the result was a clarification of the model.  

We must ensure that we don't add to the confusion by having two documents
telling different stories and folks not sure which to go by.  Any new
document must be authoritative.  I'm not sure what that means in terms of
w3c process.

Received on Friday, 8 September 2000 11:54:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:25 UTC