www-rdf-interest@w3.org from September 2000 by date

Sunday, 1 October 2000

• Re: aboutEachPrefix: possible alternative Eric Hellman
• Re: RDF Namespaces and Attributes (again) Perry A. Caro

Saturday, 30 September 2000

• RE: RDF Namespaces and Attributes (again) Jason Diamond
• Re: RDF Namespaces and Attributes (again) Perry A. Caro
• RE: RDF Namespaces and Attributes (again) Jason Diamond
• Re: aboutEachPrefix: possible alternative Mark Nottingham
• Re: RDF Namespaces and Attributes (again) Dan Brickley
• RDF Namespaces and Attributes (again) Jason Diamond
• Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable Ian Horrocks
• Re: aboutEachPrefix: possible alternative Dan Brickley
• W3C Notes: RDF and XLink; Photo-RDF Dan Brickley

Friday, 29 September 2000

• aboutEachPrefix: possible alternative Mark Nottingham
• Re: RDF for sitemapping: Biz/ed testbed data Aaron Swartz
• Re: Fwd: Call for Participation: XML Encryption Workshop Dan Brickley
• Fwd: Call for Participation: XML Encryption Workshop Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• RE: [RSS-DEV] Prism and RSS 1.0 Ron Daniel
• ANNOUNCEMENT: Redland 0.9.4 Dave Beckett
• Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable Jan Grant
• Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable Graham Klyne
• Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable; constraints should be identical Jan Grant
• Re: range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable; constraints should be identical Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• range, domain: Conjunctive AND disjunctive semantics both supportable; constraints should be identical Jan Grant
• Possible RDBMS solution Craig Pugsley
• SV: Nodes and Arcs 1989-1999: WWW history and RDF (revisited...) Greg FitzPatrick
• Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF::Service v0.01 Jonas Liljegren

Thursday, 28 September 2000

• Re: Enumerations Mark Grossman
• Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF::Service v0.01 Rahul Dave
• ANNOUNCE: RDF::Service v0.01 Jonas Liljegren
• The subject of that statement is a literal jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: previous discussion of issues Tom Van Eetvelde
• Re: online course on Metadata Sigfrid Lundberg, Lub NetLab
• Re: Nodes and Arcs 1989-1999: WWW history and RDF (revisited...) Dan Connolly
• Re: online course on Metadata Johan Hjelm

Wednesday, 27 September 2000

• Re: Enumerations Mor Peleg
• RDF for sitemapping: Biz/ed testbed data Dan Brickley
• previous discussion of issues McBride, Brian
• online course on Metadata Margit Hofer
• Re: Nodes and Arcs 1989-1999: WWW history and RDF (revisited...) Dan Brickley
• Re: Nodes and Arcs 1989-1999: WWW history and RDF (revisited...) Michael Rose
• Re: Enumerations Tom Van Eetvelde
• Nodes and Arcs 1989-1999: WWW history and RDF (revisited...) Dan Brickley
• Re: Enumerations Tom Van Eetvelde

Monday, 25 September 2000

• about reification and exactly one jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Tuesday, 26 September 2000

• Re: FRODO RDFSViz (RDF Schema visualization tool) yang aekyung
• Re: Enumerations Mark Grossman
• Re: Enumerations Ross Judson
• Re: Enumerations Mor Peleg
• Re: Enumerations Tom Van Eetvelde
• Re: http://www.w3org/RDF/ project listings uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
• Enumerations Tom Van Eetvelde
• Re: Meaning of Alt Tom Van Eetvelde

Monday, 25 September 2000

• Re: FRODO RDFSViz (RDF Schema visualization tool) (rdf:resource vs. resource issue, again) Dan Connolly
• ANN: 4Suite 0.9.0 uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
• RE: [xtm-wg] a get-together of some RDF and TopicMap folks Miller,Eric

Saturday, 23 September 2000

• (reification => closed models) ? Eric Hellman
• RE: Extracting and reifying RDF statements from XML Jonathan Borden

Friday, 22 September 2000

• FRODO RDFSViz (RDF Schema visualization tool) Michael Sintek
• Re: Extracting and reifying RDF statements from XML jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Thursday, 21 September 2000

• Extracting and reifying RDF statements from XML Jonathan Borden
• ANN: 4Suite 0.9.0 uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
• Reminder: First DELOS Workshop "Information Seeking, Searching and Querying in Digital Libraries" Klemens Boehm
• Re: RDF and UML Sergey Melnik
• RDF and UML Kaustubh Kunte

Wednesday, 20 September 2000

• Re: abstract model and reification Graham Klyne
• Re[1] abstract model and reification Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
• RE: abstract model and reification Graham Klyne
• RE: abstract model and reification Graham Klyne
• RE: abstract model and reification McBride, Brian
• RE: abstract model and reification McBride, Brian

Tuesday, 19 September 2000

• RE: abstract model and reification Graham Klyne
• E-Content Workshop Bursaries a_badii@europa.mmb.nene.ac.uk
• RE: a get-together of some RDF and TopicMap folks Didier PH Martin
• RE: abstract model and reification McBride, Brian
• RE: abstract model and reification McBride, Brian
• Closing the loop with a Java interface for rdfDB. Eric van der Vlist
• Re: abstract model and reification Graham Klyne
• Call for Papers: ACH/ALLC Conference, June 2001 John Lavagnino
• Re: abstract model and reification Jan Grant

Monday, 18 September 2000

• Re: abstract model and reification Seth Russell
• Re: abstract model and reification Graham Klyne
• Spoken language, multimedia and metadata Klaus Ries
• RE: [xtm-wg] a get-together of some RDF and TopicMap folks Michel Biezunski
• Re: Namespace squatting: please don't Dan Connolly
• Re: abstract model and reification Dan Brickley
• a get-together of some RDF and TopicMap folks Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF for genealogy Harold M Thrower

Sunday, 17 September 2000

• RE: Namespace squatting: please don't Jonathan Borden

Saturday, 16 September 2000

• Re: Namespace squatting: please don't jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• What could be the drawback of an intermediate reified RDF sy jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Namespace squatting: please don't Sergey Melnik

Friday, 15 September 2000

• Re: Namespace squatting: please don't Jonathan Borden
• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property") Natalya Fridman Noy
• Re: Namespace squatting: please don't Dan Connolly
• Re: Namespace squatting: please don't Jonathan Borden
• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property") Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• abstract model and reification McBride, Brian
• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property") Lee Jonas
• RE: abstract model Graham Klyne
• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property") Dan Brickley
• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property") Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property") Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Is the reification of a resource unique. McBride, Brian
• RE: abstract model McBride, Brian
• Re: SV: abstract model Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
• Re: SV: abstract model Dan Brickley
• SV: abstract model Greg FitzPatrick
• Schematron Mail list Rick Jelliffe
• RE: abstract model Jan Grant
• Re: W3C Announces XML Protocol Activity (fwd) David Fallside/Santa Teresa/IBM
• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property") Natalya Fridman Noy

Thursday, 14 September 2000

• RE: abstract model Graham Klyne
• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range Graham Klyne
• Re: Namespace squatting: please don't Dan Brickley
• Namespace squatting: please don't Dan Connolly
• RE: abstract model McBride, Brian
• W3C Announces XML Protocol Activity (fwd) Dan Brickley
• Re: Last call on XLink -> RDF mapping Jonathan Borden
• RE: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property") Lee Jonas
• RE: Last call on XLink -> RDF mapping Ron Daniel
• Re: Typing of literals Ross Judson
• Re: Typing of literals Jonathan Borden
• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range Lee Jonas
• Re: Typing of literals Graham Klyne
• Typing of literals Ross Judson
• SIP & CC/PP @tsm.es
• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property") Dan Brickley
• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range Graham Klyne
• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property") Lee Jonas
• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property") Dan Brickley
• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range Graham Klyne
• RE: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re : RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property") Bill dehOra
• CC/PP Implementors Day - Invitation Johan Hjelm
• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property") Guha

Wednesday, 13 September 2000

• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property") Natalya Fridman Noy
• Re: Last call on XLink -> RDF mapping Jonathan Borden
• Re: Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property") Guha
• FRODO RDFSViz: an RDF Schema visualization tool Michael Sintek
• RE: ANN: XSLT RDF Parser Jason Diamond
• Re: aboutEachPrefix: what to do? Graham Klyne
• RE: Last call on XLink -> RDF mapping Jonathan Borden
• aboutEachPrefix: what to do? Dan Brickley
• Another RDF issue? Graham Klyne
• Re: ANN: XSLT RDF Parser Dan Brickley
• Some thoughts on the semantics of domain and range (was: Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property") Jeen Broekstra
• ANN: XSLT RDF Parser Jason Diamond

Tuesday, 12 September 2000

• Mapping XML to RDF via XSLT: an implementation Jonathan Borden
• Last call on XLink -> RDF mapping Ron Daniel
• Taylor's Campaign: updated library list Richard Cohen
• RE: abstract model Graham Klyne
• Re: Ann: Promenade RDF Parser Sergey Melnik
• Now I no longer know what my opinion is :-( Was RE: abstract model Jan Grant
• RE: abstract model McBride, Brian
• Ann: Promenade RDF Parser Janne Saarela
• Re: abstract model Jan Grant

Monday, 11 September 2000

• abstract model McBride, Brian
• Re: yet another strawman, was Re: generic XML to RDF triple mappi ng Jonathan Borden
• Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Tim Berners-Lee
• ANNOUNCE: new mailing list, www-rdf-logic@w3.org Dan Brickley
• Re: Analysis of Anon Resources (long) Graham Klyne
• Strawman: RDF-Model-Summary-1 Graham Klyne
• Re: generic XML to RDF triple mapping Graham Klyne
• RDF and the DARPA DAML effort Jim Hendler
• Scraping RSS/RDF out of the W3C home page Dan Connolly
• Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Dan Brickley
• RE: XSLT RDF Parser Jason Diamond
• RE: XSLT RDF Parser Jason Diamond
• RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: overloading of "model" Was: off the top issues list Jan Grant
• Re: generic XML to RDF triple mapping Dan Brickley
• Re: Analysis of Anon Resources (long) Jan Grant
• Re: generic XML to RDF triple mapping Graham Klyne
• RE: discussion strawman: RDF Data Model Summary Graham Klyne
• RE: off the top issues list Graham Klyne
• Re: XSLT RDF Parser jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: XSLT RDF Parser Dan Brickley
• Re: XSLT RDF Parser jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• XSLT RDF Parser Jason Diamond
• Re: What about associativity in all these strawman proposals jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: discussion strawman: RDF Data Model Summary Lee Jonas

Sunday, 10 September 2000

• What about associativity in all these strawman proposals jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• RE: off the top issues list McBride, Brian

Saturday, 9 September 2000

• Re: discussion strawman: RDF Data Model Summary Lee Jonas
• RE: yet another strawman, was Re: generic XML to RDF triple mappi ng Dan Brickley

Friday, 8 September 2000

• RE: yet another strawman, was Re: generic XML to RDF triple mappi ng James Tauber
• RE: yet another strawman, was Re: generic XML to RDF triple mappi ng James Tauber

Saturday, 9 September 2000

• edge-labelled graphs in XML (fwd) Dan Brickley
• GINF roadmap (Re: SOAP, RDF and Semantic Web screenscraping...) Sergey Melnik
• RE: yet another strawman, was Re: generic XML to RDF triple mapping Jonathan Borden
• Re: Webize - how to put a system on the web Sergey Melnik

Friday, 8 September 2000

• Re: SOAP, RDF and Semantic Web screenscraping... Alex Barnell
• Webize - how to put a system on the web Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: yet another strawman, was Re: generic XML to RDF triple mappi ng Jonathan Borden
• Re: yet another strawman, was Re: generic XML to RDF triple mappi ng Jonathan Borden
• RE: yet another strawman, was Re: generic XML to RDF triple mappi ng Dan Brickley
• Re: Analysis of Anon Resources (long) Jonathan Borden
• Notes on RDF, Xlink as linked information systems Dan Brickley
• RE: yet another strawman, was Re: generic XML to RDF triple mappi ng James Tauber
• Re: yet another strawman, was Re: generic XML to RDF triple mapping Dan Brickley
• yet another strawman, was Re: generic XML to RDF triple mapping Jonathan Borden
• RE: discussion strawman: RDF Data Model Summary Dan Brickley
• RE: discussion strawman: RDF Data Model Summary McBride, Brian
• discussion strawman: RDF Data Model Summary Dan Brickley
• Talk about future of XML Tim Berners-Lee
• RE: RDF Issues McBride, Brian
• RE: RDF Issues Bill dehOra
• RE: RDF Issues James Tauber
• RE: RDF Issues Bill dehOra
• RE: RDF Issues James Tauber
• RDF Issues Lee Jonas
• generic XML to RDF triple mapping James Tauber
• Analysis of Anon Resources (long) McBride, Brian
• [www-rdf-interest] <none> sdclsdc@aceh.wasantara.net.id
• RE: SOAP, RDF and Semantic Web screenscraping... James Tauber
• RE: Meaning of Alt Jonathan Borden
• Re: SOAP, RDF and Semantic Web screenscraping... Rahul Dave
• RE: SOAP, RDF and Semantic Web screenscraping... Didier PH Martin
• RE: SOAP, RDF and Semantic Web screenscraping... James Tauber

Thursday, 7 September 2000

• Re: Protege and RDF Ray Fergerson
• Re: Meaning of Alt Ray Fergerson
• SOAP, RDF and Semantic Web screenscraping... Dan Brickley
• Re: Protege and RDF Sergey Melnik
• Re: Research notebook: On edge-labelled graphs in XML Sergey Melnik
• Re: Meaning of Alt Jonathan Borden
• Re: Meaning of Alt Graham Klyne
• Protege and RDF Ray Fergerson
• Re: Meaning of Alt Ray Fergerson
• Re: off the top issues list Graham Klyne
• Re: Meaning of Alt Graham Klyne
• Networked Knowledge Organization Systems: CfP for JoDI special issue and invitation to ECDL2000 workshop Traugott.Koch@ub2.lu.se
• off the top issues list McBride, Brian
• Re: Research notebook: On edge-labelled graphs in XML Simon Cox

Wednesday, 6 September 2000

• Re: Fwd: Re: Encrypted Node URI and NodeType Dan Brickley
• Fwd: Re: Encrypted Node URI and NodeType Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
• Re: Meaning of Alt Ray Fergerson
• Research notebook: On edge-labelled graphs in XML Dan Brickley
• Model, Syntax, API, Query... discussion documents Dan Brickley
• RDF issue: collections Graham Klyne
• One issue and a brief Re on "A Logical Interpretation of RDF" Wolfram Conen
• Semantic Web Workshop: Final Call for Participation Greg Karvounarakis
• SVG RDF tool Daniel Dardailler
• Re: RDF Issue Tracking: two issues Dan Brickley
• RDF Issue Tracking: two issues Graham Klyne
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-daigle-uri-std-00.txt (fwd) Bill dehOra
• EKAW'2000 2nd Call for participation Rose Dieng

Tuesday, 5 September 2000

• Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF Sergey Melnik
• RDF and contexts -- discussion paper Graham Klyne
• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-daigle-uri-std-00.txt (fwd) Dan Brickley
• NYTimes.com Article: Plan Aims to Foster Electronic Commerce Between Businesses love26@gorge.net
• RDF Issue Tracking: help needed Dan Brickley
• Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF Stefan Kokkelink
• Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
• RE: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF Graham Klyne
• RE: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF McBride, Brian

Monday, 4 September 2000

• Re: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF Wolfram Conen
• Re: Referencing items in RDF Aaron Swartz
• RE: RE: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF McBride, Brian
• Re: Meaning of Alt Graham Klyne
• RE: RE: Discussion-Paper: A Logical Interpretation of RDF Wolfram Conen
• Perl library for rdfDB Carl Lagoze
• Re: Announcing RDFdb Carl Lagoze
• Re: Referencing items in RDF Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
• Re: Meaning of Alt Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 3 September 2000

• Re: Referencing items in RDF Aaron Swartz
• Re: Referencing items in RDF Seth Russell
• Re: Referencing items in RDF Aaron Swartz
• Re: Referencing items in RDF Dan Brickley
• Referencing items in RDF Aaron Swartz
• RDF API draft method problems Alison Anderson
• Stanford API update Sergey Melnik

Friday, 1 September 2000

• Meaning of Alt Ray Fergerson
• FW: RE: aboutEachPrefix: drop or specify via startsWith David Wagner
• Re: RDF: better syntax effort - who could contribute? Seth Russell
• RE: RDF: better syntax effort - who could contribute? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• RE: RDF: better syntax effort - who could contribute? McBride, Brian

Last message date: Saturday, 30 September 2000 23:27:19 UTC