Re: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements

• From: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
• Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 12:55:13 +0000
• To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
• Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3c.org
• Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001130125242.00b91620@pop.dial.pipex.com>

At 01:27 PM 11/29/00 +0000, Libby Miller wrote:
>Looking at your definition of when a model contains, a reification of a
>statement exists independantly to the statement itself, according to the
>M&S, so that contains(s,p,o) would be false if the interpretation of the
>model only contains a reification of the statement. So because of our
>reinterpretation of the statements we've found from a rdf source, we get
>different query results than if we had not reified the statements.

I think that's a good point, and one that I need to consider in relation to 
my contexts work.  This approach of defining/analyzing abstract query 
operations could be fruitful.

#g

------------
Graham Klyne
(GK@ACM.ORG)

Received on Thursday, 30 November 2000 12:33:03 UTC