- From: Jonas Liljegren <jonas@rit.se>
- Date: 27 Nov 2000 13:07:42 +0100
- To: Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@jfinity.com>
- Cc: Stefan Decker <stefan@db.stanford.edu>, pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, RDF-Logic <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>, "www-rdf-interest@w3.org" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, Wraf development <rdf@uxn.nu>
Gabe Beged-Dov <begeddov@jfinity.com> writes: > Ground Statement: > [Bush, wonThe, Election] > > Reified Statement Resource: > [ECResults#id1, type, statement] > [ECResults#id1, subject, Bush] > [ECResults#id1, predicate, wonThe] > [ECResults#id1, predicate, Election] > > Syntactic context for Reified Statement Resource: > [ECResults#bag1, rdf:_1, ECResults#id1] > [ECResults#bag1, type, Bag] > > Comments? Yes. I appreciate that you have repeated it several times now. I had a vague memory of it but had ignored it. But I know see that this is the right way. Can we all be in agreement that this proves that the reified statement can be used as a stating? But we can't use the outmost Description bag as the model. The uri of the model will be the uri of the document. It will have metadata stating things about it's encoding, namespaces used, time of retrieval, authority, and more. -- / Jonas Liljegren The Wraf project http://www.uxn.nu/wraf/ Sponsored by http://www.rit.se/
Received on Monday, 27 November 2000 07:05:18 UTC