- From: Jonas Liljegren <jonas@rit.se>
- Date: 23 Nov 2000 13:21:41 +0100
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
- Cc: Bill de hÓra <dehora@acm.org>, "ML RDF-interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3c.org>
Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com> writes: > Under the present regime, I think the pain of disallowing partial > reification (e.g. "syncing and transaction mechanism") is greater than > the pain of allowing it. Also, I don't see how one can prevent > somebody from creating a model such as: > > [S] --rdf:Type-----> [rdf:Statement] > [S] --rdf:Subject--> [SomeResource] Heh! This could be used as an alternative to having dedicated variable URIs in queries. The above would match all statements with the specified subject. But I still prefere having the varaiables... -- / Jonas Liljegren The Wraf project http://www.uxn.nu/wraf/ Sponsored by http://www.rit.se/
Received on Thursday, 23 November 2000 07:20:36 UTC