- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 08:23:35 -0800
- To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
William Loughborough wrote: > Seth Russell: "The W3C has already recommended RDF, I don't understand what > additional signal you're waiting for." > > So in reply to Seth's question, I'm waiting for the ability to insert stuff > in my XHTML files that will be usable by RDF software. I understand that > this is in turn awaiting the modularization of XHTML. My answer is the same: there is nothing to wait for. The [RDF] spec has been written, discussed, and recommended. People are implementing it now as we speak. If you insert [RDF] in the syntax as described by [M&S], then [RDF] software will be able to use it. Please do not become confused by the current discussions, they will have little or no impact on what has already been agreed upon. Of course I speak only for myself. And, please, by all means let me personally know when and where you have written your XHTML pages so that I may tell [MyMemory] to go read them to increase its education. <signature source="access://robustai.net/MyMemory/Seth/?assert=thisEmail" format="mime/topic" context="SM"> topic: M&S anagramOf: Model and Syntax URI: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/ bibleOf: RDF topic: RDF anagramOf: Resource Description Framework linguaFrancaOf: SM isA: natural language topic: SM anagramOf: Semantic Web topic: MyMemory reads: RDF writes: RDF reads: mime/topic writes: mime/topic topic: Seth Russell needsHelpWith: MyMemory </signature>
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2000 11:22:06 UTC