- From: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:17:36 +0000
- To: Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN <champin@bat710.univ-lyon1.fr>
- Cc: RDF-IG <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
At 10:07 AM 11/21/00 +0100, Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN wrote: >But the quetion you quote maybe hides a deeper one : "does RDF describe >only resources, or does it also describe entities". >My guess is that when a resources resolves to a unique entity, it is very >tempting to describe the entity rather than the resource -- and I'm pretty >sure some RDF users already did. To put it roughly, I think an entity can be a resource, but a resource is not necessarily an entity. Now, to try and be a little more precise: I think the conceptual mapping [RFC2396] associated with a resource MAY be with a single entity; other resources MAY have conceptual mappings that involve several entities, or none at all. Therefore, I don't think using RDF to "describe an entity" raises any problems. #g ------------ Graham Klyne (GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2000 11:11:50 UTC