- From: Jonas Liljegren <jonas@rit.se>
- Date: 19 Nov 2000 17:27:53 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>, RDF-IG <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> writes: > We have a name for this problem on the Issue Tracking page: > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-identity-of-statements The answer to this question influence the way we can say things about reified statements. As an example (don't know anything about the dates.. :-) Model 1: S1: god notplayswith dice S2: S1 statedBy einstein S3: S1 statedAt 1950-04-10 Model 2: S1: god notplayswith dice S2: S1 statedBy jonas S3: S1 statedAt 2000-11-17 Combined: S1: god notplayswith dice S2: S1 statedBy einstein S3: S1 statedBy jonas S4: S1 statedAt 1950-04-10 S5: S1 statedAt 2000-11-17 Is this what we want? In that case, we will have to make the *stating* diffrent from the *statement*: S1: god notplayswith dice S2: S1 statedBy einstein S3: S2 statedAt 1950-04-10 -- / Jonas Liljegren The Wraf project http://www.uxn.nu/wraf/ Sponsored by http://www.rit.se/
Received on Sunday, 19 November 2000 11:26:51 UTC