- From: Jonas Liljegren <jonas@rit.se>
- Date: 17 Nov 2000 19:29:46 +0100
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com> writes: > At 05:36 PM 11/17/00 +0100, Jonas Liljegren wrote: > >I think that the most important part of the interoperability is to > >establish a common schema for the metadata used in the system. > > Hmmm... using the same schema won't help interoperability if you've > no way to exchange it at the syntactic level. The schema is used to make statements about the model and other things. Those statements can be shared with the rest of the world. With interoperability, I mean the interoperability of *Services*. Then a clint ask a question to a service, it will react by ask other questions with other services. The communication with the client and between services can be defined by using common schemas. > I agree that common schema is important for some purposes, and > especially interesting ones, but interoperability generally REQUIRES > that a range of standard mechanisms are used, all of which are vital > for interoperability. Well. I would think that the standard mechanism will be describe alongside the appropriate schemas. -- / Jonas Liljegren The Wraf project http://www.uxn.nu/wraf/ Sponsored by http://www.rit.se/
Received on Friday, 17 November 2000 13:27:39 UTC