- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 14:21:49 -0500
- To: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 12:38:51PM +0000, Dan Brickley wrote: > In the light of this and other implementation activities > recently announced on www-rdf-interest, I reckon the time is fast > approaching that we lock various RDF API implementors in a room and > only let them out when there's a common strawman API. ... > Opinions? (views from those with running code count double ;-) Dan, I think an effort like this is a great idea. However, given the relatively large list of recorded issues at: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/ and: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0240.html I wonder if such an effort would be premature. That is, given that the "resolution" of some of these issues is likely to result in changes/clarifcations in the RDF specs, it seems like the issues should be "formally" addressed first. Art ---
Received on Saturday, 11 November 2000 14:21:51 UTC