- From: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 10:40:40 +0000
- To: Tom Van Eetvelde <tom.van_eetvelde@alcatel.be>
- Cc: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
At 11:08 AM 11/8/00 +0100, Tom Van Eetvelde wrote: >Suppose you have the class insects. You want to say that this class is >big. That doesn't mean of >course that every class instance is big. Nice one! >Can this be solved via a new constraintproperty 'commonInstanceValue' (I >am not creative enough at >the moment to invent a nice name) and leaving 'domain' as it is in the >specification? This way, it >is explicit which class properties may be applied to class instances and >instances of subclasses and >which not. My understanding is that OIL and friends use slots and slot-constraints in this way (I think this descends from earlier work on frames). #g -- > > At 11:26 AM 10/23/00 +0200, Tom Van Eetvelde wrote: > > >Bad idea! :-) I believe my proposal can model in a more natural way what > > >you want to do. > > > > Tom, > > > > I accept that my original idea was not great, but I have one problem with > > your proposal. My concern applies to your proposal in the "definition of > > domain" thread, and also to the counter-example you offer to mine: > > > > ><rdfs:Class ID="Ford_Escort"> > > ><rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="Car"/> > > ><s:bodyStyle> Hatchback </s:bodyStyle> > > ><s:engine_fueltype> Petrol </s:engine_fueltype> > > ></rdfs:Class> > > > > I accept the idea of using a class as a kind of prototype, but have a > > problem with this particular representation. Specifically, how statements > > about the class be distinguished from statements about instances of the > > class; e.g. I might wish to say something like: > > > > [FordEscord] --rdf:type---> [rdfs:Class] > > [ ] --definedBy--> [FordMotorCompany] > > [ ] --bodyStyle--> "HatchBack" > > (etc.) > > > > Here, the intent of the properties "definedBy" and "bodyStyle" is very > > different. One is a statement about the class itself, and the other is a > > prototype for instances of the class. > > > > I'm still thinking about this stuff, so I'll pursue this further as I bet > > my ideas sorted. > > > > #g > > -- > > > > ------------ > > Graham Klyne > > (GK@ACM.ORG) ------------ Graham Klyne (GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Thursday, 9 November 2000 05:13:53 UTC