- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 13:47:59 -0800
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- Cc: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, unagi69@concentric.net, wendy@w3.org, kasday@pop3.concentric.net, hbingham@acm.org
At 08:48 PM 11/8/00 +0000, Sean B. Palmer wrote:
>Doing something about the SW
Absolutely awesome!
Can anybody else join in this thing? My nerd genes faded into oblivion
about 15 years ago (just between Assembler and C++) but the possibility
that you have done what could lead to a "geezer-friendly" system for
putting RDF stuff into an XHTML file, particularly if we get all those
"about (required), creator, date, description, format, language, publisher,
relation, rights, subject, title" items you list.
In the WAI Working Groups for both content guidelines and tools (and
possibly protocols/formats) we are wrestling with the notion of
suggesting/requiring metadata dealing with the conformance claims made by
authors that are a little more reassuring than just a logo at the bottom.
As more regulations on publicly-funded sites' accessibility-for-everyone
proliferate this is going to be a means of self-regulation that would fit
in nicely.
I would like to commend you for actually doing something in this matter.
Perhaps the action/talk ratio is taking a turn towards becoming > 1?
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2000 16:46:15 UTC