- From: Tom Van Eetvelde <tom.van_eetvelde@alcatel.be>
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 10:52:25 +0100
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
- CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2000 04:54:37 UTC
Hello Graham, I disaggree with you. This mapping exists (see Olivier Corby on Thursday 26/10/2000). This means RDF is immediately enriched with all the results that come from conceptual graphs, including logic, query language, ... Re-use in other words. I think lots of problems people are struggling now with in RDF have already been solved in Conceptual Graphs. So I am quite surprised with your last statement. Greetings, Tom. Graham Klyne wrote: > I came across conceptual graphs (in "Artificial Intelligence" by Luger and > Stubblefield) in my early studies of RDF but did not feel they were a good > fit at the time. I've just taken a quick review of that material, and did > not spot anything that substantially alters my view. I think one *could* > map the RDF ideas to conceptual graphs, or vice versa, but I'm not sure > that so doing moves us closer to solving any interesting problems. > > #g > --
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2000 04:54:37 UTC