Re: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?) from Sankar Virdhagriswaran on 2000-11-06 (www-rdf-interest@w3.org from November 2000)

From: Sankar Virdhagriswaran <sv@hunchuen.crystaliz.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 13:33:52 -0500
To: "Matt Jensen" <mattj@newsblip.com>, "Gordon Joly" <gordo@dircon.co.uk>
Cc: "Craig Pugsley" <craig.pugsley@mimesweeper.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00a801c04820$1cc8aa00$4975ef8c@crystaliz.com>

> it can claim.  If you're looking for a Semantic Web that can give you
> "truth", we've got a long wait.  If you're looking for something that
> improves search results through related concepts and simple inferences, in
> a few years you should be able to get something that's useful, but not
> perfect.
>
>


Hear, hear!

Received on Monday, 6 November 2000 13:31:04 UTC