- From: Graham Klyne <GK@dial.pipex.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 15:11:13 +0000
- To: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
>"Rather than gabble on about what I think Semantic Web might mean >I'm pretty curious to hear what folk on this list understand by the >phrase. As Edd points out, we could do with some more accessible >materials in this area. " OK, here's another two-pence worth... The semantic web aims to do for information what the Internet and WWW have done for data. Today, the Internet, and the WWW in particular, allow data to be exchanged between an arbitrary pair of systems, without regard for or discrimination among different system types, data content or the service to which the data relates. Today, information tends to be bound up in the data format of the application for which it is designed. Without the right application, the information content of data is inaccessible. The semantic web will make the information content of exchanged data accessible to any application that understands semantic web protocols. In other words, an "end-to-end architecture for content". #g -- PS: those who were at WWW9 may detect echoes of Lawrence Lessig's presentation. I think the lack of discrimination between applications is a significant feature. PPS: this description pointedly avoids mention of "smart" or "intelligent" behaviours. Though many of the ideas are based on AI research, I don't think intelligence is at issue. I might paraphrase Clark's law: "Any sufficiently complex behaviour is indistinguishable from intelligence". ------------ Graham Klyne (GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Monday, 6 November 2000 09:27:23 UTC