- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 08:29:12 -0500 (EST)
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- cc: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Sean B. Palmer wrote: > Maybe the W3C could provide a sw-talk@w3.org, a bit like www-talk, but for > the Semantic Web. But the Semantic Web will _be_ the Web - we're not talking about a 'new' Web here, just finishing off the job with the existing one. Edd's article makes the point that deployed technology (XHTML, XSLT) etc provide the foundations for SW. In that light, a new list might innacurately suggest some artificial binary divide between old and new Web technology. See previous comment on www-talk, Web history etc., Dan
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2000 08:29:13 UTC