Thursday, 30 November 2000
- Re: But is it a model?
- Re: How/Why to implement Reification efficiently...
- Re: How/Why to implement Reification efficiently...
- But is it a model?
- Re: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements
- Contexts and statements, reification and model
Wednesday, 29 November 2000
Thursday, 30 November 2000
- Re: How/Why to implement Reification efficiently...
- RDF Resource Guide
- Re: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements
- Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model
- Re: How/Why to implement Reification efficiently...
- RE: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reifi ed' statements
- RE: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reifi ed' statements
- One more WSDL article
- Re: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements
Wednesday, 29 November 2000
Tuesday, 28 November 2000
Wednesday, 29 November 2000
- Re: Why contexts? (was: Klyne Contexts: 5.3-5.5 resources, languages and frames)
- Re: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements
Tuesday, 28 November 2000
- RE: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Why contexts? (was: Klyne Contexts: 5.3-5.5 resources, languages and frames)
- Re: Of partial reification
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Klyne Contexts: 3. Statements sets in RDF
Wednesday, 29 November 2000
- Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model
- Re: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements
- RSS 1.0 "Release Candidate" - implementor sanity checks invited
- Re: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements
- Re: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements
- Re: Resource discovery question
- Resource discovery question
- Re: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements
- Optional reification
- Re: [RDF] Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model)
- Re: xml:base as context/space URI? was Re: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements
- Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model)
- ANNOUNCEMENT: Converters for RDF(S), DAML-O, UML/XMI, Protege, reification, new XML serializer
- Re: Coordinating XML schema and RDF schema
Tuesday, 28 November 2000
- Re: Coordinating XML schema and RDF schema
- xml:base as context/space URI? was Re: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements
- Re: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements
- Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model)
- What is RDF? Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The R DF Model)
- Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model
- Re: summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements
- Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model
- RE: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The R DF Model)
- Re: [RDF] Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model)
- Re: Coordinating XML schema and RDF schema
- Re: Coordinating XML schema and RDF schema
- Re: Coordinating XML schema and RDF schema
- Security News
- Re: Why contexts? (was: Klyne Contexts: 5.3-5.5 resources, languages and frames)
- summary of 'a triple is not unique' and 'statements/reified' statements
- Coordinating XML schema and RDF schema
- ANNOUNCEMENT: RDFStore 0.3
- Re: Klyne Contexts: 5.2 Contexts as statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- RE: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model)
- Re: [RDF] Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model)
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model)
- SW and Pervasive Computing RE: More On the Semantic Web
- Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model)
- Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model)
- Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model)
Monday, 27 November 2000
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model)
- Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model
- Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model)
- XSLT RDF Extractor for XHTML Files
- Do NOT Open Email sent (allegedly) from me with attachment: I Did n't Send it!!!!
- Re: Why contexts? (was: Klyne Contexts: 5.3-5.5 resources, languages and frames)
- Re: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model)
- speech acts
- RDF query and RDF storage in memory
- RE: tracing statement origin (was Re: I have a trouble with The RDF Model)
Sunday, 26 November 2000
Monday, 27 November 2000
Sunday, 26 November 2000
Saturday, 25 November 2000
- Announce: An RDF Language - SubADL
- Re: Using XHTML as an RDF Language
- Using XHTML as an RDF Language
- Re: How?
Friday, 24 November 2000
- RE: Why contexts? (was: Klyne Contexts: 5.3-5.5 resources, languages and frames)
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Why contexts? (was: Klyne Contexts: 5.3-5.5 resources, languages and frames)
- RE: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Of partial reification
- Re: Why contexts? (was: Klyne Contexts: 5.3-5.5 resources, languages and frames)
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
Thursday, 23 November 2000
- Re: Orthogonal triples
- Re: Orthogonal triples
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Of partial reification
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Orthogonal triples
- Re: Klyne Contexts: 3. Statements sets in RDF
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Orthogonal triples
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Klyne Contexts: 3. Statements sets in RDF
- Re: Of partial reification
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Orthogonal triples
- Re: How?
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Of partial reification
- Why contexts? (was: Klyne Contexts: 5.3-5.5 resources, languages and frames)
- Re: How?
- Re: Klyne Contexts: 5.2 Contexts as statements
- Re: Of partial reification
- Klyne Contexts: 5.3-5.5 resources, languages and frames
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Of partial reification
- In defense of reification
- Klyne Contexts: 5.2 Contexts as statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- RE: Statements/Reified statements
Wednesday, 22 November 2000
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: How?
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
- Re: How?
- Re: Statements/Reified statements
Tuesday, 21 November 2000
Wednesday, 22 November 2000
- Re: How?
- How?
- Statements/Reified statements
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
Tuesday, 21 November 2000
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
Monday, 20 November 2000
- Are you looking for Class A, Hi-Tech office suite?
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: unreification && A triple is not unique
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- RE: OT: Some Help?
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: OT: Some Help?
- Re: OT: Some Help?
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- RE: unreification (long)
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- Re: unreification (long)
- Re: unreification
- Re: A triple is not unique.
Sunday, 19 November 2000
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- OT: Some Help?
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- RDF M&S issues
- Re: APIs and interoperability
- RE: A triple is not unique.
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- RE: A triple is not unique.
Saturday, 18 November 2000
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- Re: unreification
- Re: A triple is not unique.
- A triple is not unique.
- Re: unreification
Friday, 17 November 2000
- Re: unreification
- Re: APIs and interoperability
- Re: unreification
- Re: APIs and interoperability
- CfP - Semantic Web 2001 Workshop at WWW10
- Re: unreification
- Re: APIs and interoperability
Thursday, 16 November 2000
Friday, 17 November 2000
Thursday, 16 November 2000
Friday, 17 November 2000
Thursday, 16 November 2000
- Re: unreification
- Re: unreification
- Re: unreification
- Re: unreification
- RE: unreification
- ANN: 4Suite Server 0.9.2
- RE: Does RDF overlap w/XML Schema
- unreification
- Re: Does RDF overlap w/XML Schema
- Web services, RDF, and all that
- ANN: 4Suite 0.9.2
Wednesday, 15 November 2000
- Re: RDF "Language": definitions?
- Re: RDF "Language": definitions?
- Re: RDF "Language": definitions?
- Announce: New Semantic Web Interface Mailing List
- RDF "Language": definitions?
- ECDL 2001 Call for Papers
- Call for Participation: First DELOS Workshop "Information Seeking, Searching and Querying in Digital Libraries"
- Re: Does RDF overlap w/XML Schema
- RE: Does RDF overlap w/XML Schema
- RE: Does RDF overlap w/XML Schema
- RE: Does RDF overlap w/XML Schema
Tuesday, 14 November 2000
Monday, 13 November 2000
- Cambridge IS Forum-UKAIS Joint Seminar, and, Louborough & Portsmouth UKAIS(Midlands) Seminars Series
- Re: New Semantic-Web List?
- Re: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- Re: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- Re: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- Re: New Semantic-Web List?
- New Semantic-Web List?
- Re: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- ANNOUNCEMENT: RDFStore 0.2
- RDF, The 4th Brandenburger concerto and The Dublin Core
- ANNOUNCE: RDF::Service 0.03
Sunday, 12 November 2000
- RE: RDF in Open Directory project
- Re: RDF API convergence?
- Re: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- Re: RDF Conformance was RE: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- Re: RDF in Annotations and Amaya
- Re: RDF in Annotations and Amaya
- Re: A standard API for RDF
- Re: RDF in Annotations and Amaya
- RDF in Annotations and Amaya
- RE: RDF API convergence?
- Re: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- RE: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- Re: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- RE: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- RE: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- Re: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
Saturday, 11 November 2000
- RE: RDF API convergence?
- Re: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- Re: RDF API convergence?
- RE: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- RE: RDF in Open Directory project
- Re: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- Re: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- Re: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- Re: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- RDF Conformance was RE: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- RE: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- Re: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- RE: RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- RDF API convergence? was Re: ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
- ANNOUNCE: RDF.NET
Friday, 10 November 2000
- Re: Semantic Document Framework(s) [language]
- Updated Call for Papers: ACH/ALLC Conference, June 2001
- Using (RDF) meta-data for Page Accessibility
Monday, 6 November 2000
Friday, 10 November 2000
- Re: Semantic Document Framework(s) [language]
- Re: Semantic Document Framework(s) [language]
- Re: Semantic Document Framework(s)
- Re: Semantic Document Framework(s) [language]
- Re: RDF in Open Directory project
- RE: RDF in Open Directory project
- RE: RDF in Open Directory project
- Re: Semantic Document Framework(s)
- Re: Semantic Document Framework(s)
- Re: Semantic Document Framework(s)
Saturday, 11 November 2000
Friday, 10 November 2000
Thursday, 9 November 2000
Friday, 10 November 2000
Thursday, 9 November 2000
Friday, 10 November 2000
Thursday, 9 November 2000
- Semantic mail - weekend edition
- Re: Semantic Document Framework(s)
- RE: XML.com 'Semantic Web: A Primer' article (the SW and you
- Re: Semantic Document Framework(s)
- The Semantic Web: What Can I Do?
- Re: Semantic Document Framework(s)
- Re: Chainsaw?
- Re: XML.com 'Semantic Web: A Primer' article (the SW and you
- Re: Chainsaw?
- Re: Chainsaw?
- Re: Chainsaw?
- Re: XML.com 'Semantic Web: A Primer' article (the SW and you
- Re: Semantic Document Framework(s)
- Re: Semantic Web: RDF Module For XHTML m12n
Wednesday, 8 November 2000
- Re: Semantic Web: RDF Module For XHTML m12n
- Re: Semantic mail
- Re: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- Re: Semantic Web: RDF Module For XHTML m12n
- Re: Semantic Web Roadmap Strawman
- Re: Semantic Web: RDF Module For XHTML m12n
- Re: Semantic Web Roadmap Strawman
- Re: Semantic Web Roadmap Strawman
Monday, 6 November 2000
Wednesday, 8 November 2000
- Semantic Web: RDF Module For XHTML m12n
- SV: Semantic mail
- Re: Chainsaw?
- Re: Semantic mail
- Re: Modelling "proper names", and other topics
- Re: Semantic Web: A Summary, and a Discussion
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- Re: Chainsaw?
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- Re: Semantic Web: A Summary, and a Discussion
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- Re: Chainsaw?
- Re: Chainsaw?
- Re: Chainsaw?
- Re: Is "Model" part of the RDF model?
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
Tuesday, 7 November 2000
- Re: Semantic Document Framework(s)
- RDF in Open Directory project
- Re: Semantic Document Framework(s)
- URI for W3C
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- SV: Semantic mail
- Re: Semantic mail
- Re: Semantic Web Roadmap Strawman
- Semantic mail
- Re: Modelling "proper names", and other topics
- RE: Semantic Web Roadmap Strawman
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- Semantic Web Roadmap Strawman
Monday, 6 November 2000
Tuesday, 7 November 2000
- Re: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- A proposal for an RDF query language
- Re: A proposal for an RDF query language
- A proposal for an RDF query language
- Re: Modelling "proper names", and other topics
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
Monday, 6 November 2000
- Re: Cryptographic digests of RDF models
- Re: Semantic Document Framework(s)
- Re: XML.com 'Semantic Web: A Primer' article (the SW and you ;-)
- Re: Semantic Document Framework(s)
- Re: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- Re: Modelling "proper names", and other topics
- Re: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- Cryptographic digests of RDF models
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- Re: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- RE: Semantic Web: A Summary, and a Discussion
- RE: [xtm-wg] a get-together of some RDF and TopicMap folks
- A proposal for an RDF query language
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- Semantic Web: A Summary, and a Discussion
- Re: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- re: xml.com 'semantic web: a primer' article (the sw and you ;- )
- Re: Semantic Web discussions lists: rdf-logic, rdf ig, www-talk, ...
- Re: Semantic Web discussions lists: rdf-logic, rdf ig, www-talk, ...
- Re: Semantic Web discussions lists: rdf-logic, rdf ig, www-talk, ...
- FW: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- What is Semantic Web?
- Re: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- RE: More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- ANNOUNCEMENT: Redland 0.9.6
- More On the Semantic Web (or: is RDF any good?)
- Semantic Document Framework(s)
- RE: XML.com 'Semantic Web: A Primer' article (the SW and you ;-)
Sunday, 5 November 2000
- i-mode用リアルタイム店舗広告HPのご案内
- Modelling "proper names", and other topics
- Re: XML.com 'Semantic Web: A Primer' article (the SW and you ;-)
- Re: XML.com 'Semantic Web: A Primer' article (the SW and you ;-)
- Re: Semantic Web discussions lists: rdf-logic, rdf ig, www-talk, ...
- Re: Semantic Web discussions lists: rdf-logic, rdf ig, www-talk, ...
- Re: XML.com 'Semantic Web: A Primer' article (the SW and you ;-)
- Semantic Web discussions lists: rdf-logic, rdf ig, www-talk, ...
- Re: XML.com 'Semantic Web: A Primer' article (the SW and you ;-)
- Re: XML.com 'Semantic Web: A Primer' article (the SW and you ;-)
- Re: XML.com 'Semantic Web: A Primer' article (the SW and you ;-)
Saturday, 4 November 2000
- Re: Integrity constraints in DAML-O (was: Chainsaw?)
- Re: XML.com 'Semantic Web: A Primer' article (the SW and you ;-)
- Re: Integrity constraints in DAML-O (was: Chainsaw?)
- Re: XML.com 'Semantic Web: A Primer' article
Friday, 3 November 2000
- Re: Integrity constraints in DAML-O (was: Chainsaw?)
- Re: XML.com 'Semantic Web: A Primer' article (the SW and you ;-)
- Re: Integrity constraints in DAML-O (was: Chainsaw?)
- Re: Chainsaw?
- XML.com 'Semantic Web: A Primer' article (the SW and you ;-)
- RE: RDF Schema Explorer (Querying/Validating/Extending RDF models )
Thursday, 2 November 2000
Friday, 3 November 2000
Thursday, 2 November 2000
- Your Online Trading Account
- Re: Chainsaw?
- Re: Chainsaw?
- Re: Chainsaw?
- Re: Chainsaw?
- Clearing the trees? (was: Chainsaw?)