- From: Graham Klyne <GK@dial.pipex.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 13:13:31 +0100
- To: "McBride, Brian" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Brian,
At 11:39 AM 5/30/00 +0100, you wrote:
>I'd argue that we have established:
>
> o the syntax I outlined in my previous message gives a representation
> as compact as one would get with the digest approach
>
> o the processing required is not significantly different to the
> digest approach
If I've got the right bit of syntax, the trouble I see is that I don't know
how to represent it in a pure graph form.
I really want to resolve this at the model level, not the XML serialization
level. For example, reading the "Cambridge
Communique" <http://www.w3.org/TR/schema-arch>, recommendation 8, we can
expect alternative serialization forms in due course.
#g
--
Is this the syntax you meant?:
<rdf:RDF>
<description about='uri for device'>
<foo:screensize ID='ss' >64 32</foo:screensize>
<foo:colours ID='clrs'>2</foo:colours>
</description>
<description about='#ss' foo:context='#context'/>
<description about='#clrs' foo:context='#context'/>
<description about='#context' foo:assertedBy='Brian'/>
</rdf:RDF>
------------
Graham Klyne
(GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2000 09:28:00 UTC