- From: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 21:08:03 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
At 12:26 AM 5/14/00 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: >Hmm... I'm not sure what you mean by "full semantic understanding." >RDF has no built-in logic whatsoever. The "full semantic understanding" >depends on more than just the availability of various things... >it depends on what inference rules you choose to use, what >sort of logic, etc. A question, if I may... I have seen two kinds of statement made about logic in RDF: (a) RDF has logical conjunction (multiple predicates of a subject generally taken to be parts of a conjunction) (b) RDF has no built-in logic (as you say above) Are there differing views, or am I missing something? #g ------------ Graham Klyne (GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2000 05:24:05 UTC