- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 11:31:11 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
re: http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/2000/05/0335.html A few of you might have come across the SOAP proposal, recently published as a NOTE on the W3C site. Interesting message from Andrew below on using SOAP's encoding rules as an alternate RDF syntax. I'm wondering whether someone on www-rdf-interest might be persuaded to write the XSLT to scrape RDF from SOAP serialisations, and to check to see whether the models are as close as they seem. --dan From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com> To: xml-dev@xml.org Cc: Frystyk <frystyk@microsoft.com>, "Dan Brickley [Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk] (E-mail)" <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>, "Eric J. Miller (E-mail)" <emiller@oclc.org> Subject: RE: Corba IDL --> XML Schema or DTD Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 21:34:58 -0700 Regarding the relation between the encoding rules in the SOAP 1.1 specification (section 5) and the RDF data model, the two are intended to be complimentary. RDF describes a data model and several encodings while allowing that additional encodings might be invented. SOAP section 5 is one such possible encoding. SOAP: http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/ RDF: http://www.w3.org/RDF/
Received on Monday, 15 May 2000 11:31:12 UTC