- From: Peter Ciuffetti <PeterC@acunet.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 14:41:36 -0400
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hello, I have been trying to puzzle out whether I can use mechanisms in RDF Schemas to cause instances of a certain class of resource to inherit property values from a parent class. For example, to extend the example 1 in the RDF Schema spec, which defines a class Person and a property maritalStatus, could I define a class MarriedPerson that is a subclass of Person and that establishes a value for property maritalStatus=Married? Something like: <rdf:RDF xml:lang="en" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"> <rdfs:Class rdf:ID="Person"> <rdfs:comment>The class of people.</rdfs:comment> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/03/example/classes#Animal"/> </rdfs:Class> <rdfs:Class rdf:ID="MarriedPerson"> <rdfs:comment>A subclass of Person inheriting a property maritalStatus 'Married'</rdfs:comment> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#Person"/> <maritalStatus> <rdf:type rdf:resource="#maritalStatus"/> <rdf:value rdf:resource="#Married"/> </maritalStatus> </rdfs:Class> <rdf:Property ID="maritalStatus"> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#MaritalStatus"/> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#Person"/> </rdf:Property> ... <rdfs:Class rdf:ID="MaritalStatus"/> <MaritalStatus rdf:ID="Married"/> <MaritalStatus rdf:ID="Divorced"/> <MaritalStatus rdf:ID="Single"/> <MaritalStatus rdf:ID="Widowed"/> </rdf:RDF> Basically why I want to do this is that I would like to avoid having to redundantly store common metadata in instances of resources that are all members of some class by specifying the metadata in the class declaration. If this is not permitted by RDF Schemas or is not in the spirit of RDF Schemas, then I'd be interested in other approaches people are using to avoid redundantly storing metadata that is common to each instance of a class. Thanks, Pete Ciuffetti
Received on Friday, 12 May 2000 14:48:31 UTC