- From: Graham Klyne <GK@dial.pipex.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 12:48:00 +0100
- To: Jan Wielemaker <jan@swi.psy.uva.nl>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
In <http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/InterpretationProperties.html>, Tim BL argues using an xml:lang _attribute_ is a mistake for RDF, and suggests alternatives. #g -- At 12:29 PM 5/10/00 +0200, Jan Wielemaker wrote: >Hi, > >Going through the rdfs stuff, I see > > <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">comment</rdfs:label> > <rdfs:label xml:lang="fr">commentaire</rdfs:label> > >Now, RDFS is expressed on RDF and thus accessible through the RDF formal >(triple) model. But, the RDF specs do not tell me where to store the >xml:lang attribute in the triple notation. > >Within the triple representation, the only option seems >reinification of the statement and making a language statement >about the reinified label statement. Isn't that going a bit too far >(especially as xml:lang inherits, so one would to reinify the whole >model ...)? > >Anyone with suggestions? > > Regards --- Jan ------------ Graham Klyne (GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2000 08:57:38 UTC