Re: Conventions and top-level ontologies for RDF

Philippe Martin wrote:
>
> > This may not be the usual way to solving this problem. But I like the
> > freedom of inventing my own OO. :-)
> 
> The less "conventional" the less (automatically) comparable with
> metadata that other users have generated, therefore the less reusable.

You are right. But RDF has some unique properties that may call for new
sorts of classes.

Especially the StatementConstraint's, as they are a consequence of the
reification ability.

-- 
/ Jonas  -  http://paranormal.se/myself/index.html