- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 18:16:54 +0200
- To: " - *connolly@w3.org" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: " - *www-rdf-interest@w3.org" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> On 17 July 2000 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com wrote: > > Dan Connolly wrote: > > Ah... thanks. I have glanced at that syntax a few > > times without understanding. Now I get it. Er... > > no, I don't: that's not legal RDF syntax, is it? > > the junction propertyNode can only have one child > > element, right? > I'm also not sure I understand what you mean. > The junction is a class name and not a property. Sorry, I was wrong: junction was indeed a propertyElt and a propertyElt can only have one typedNode [6.12->6.17->6.3]. I didn't realize that untill I used SiRPAC (Sergey's RDF-API was not complaining). We got rid of junction and are using several propertyElt's instead (if, and-if, if-not, and-if-not). -- Jos De Roo
Received on Monday, 31 July 2000 12:18:40 UTC