- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 17:24:24 +0200
- To: " - *danbri@w3.org" <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: " - *www-rdf-interest@w3.org" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Hi Dan, We were able to fix our broken Euler [1]. We also played a bit with rule syntax ... So we have for example [2] <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:r="http://euler.org/"> <r:member r:source="mailto:jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com" r:drain="http://www.agfa.com"/> <r:member r:source="http://www.agfa.com" r:drain="http://www.w3.org"/> <r:subscribed r:source="http://www.agfa.com" r:drain="mailto:w3c-ac-forum@w3.org/"/> <r:authenticated r:source="Person" r:drain="Mailinglist"> <r:member r:source="Person" r:drain="Institution"/> <r:member r:source="Institution" r:drain="http://www.w3.org"/> <r:subscribed r:source="Institution" r:drain="Mailinglist"/> </r:authenticated> </rdf:RDF> Now if we parse this we don't get rdf:type triples for the nodes <r:member r:source="Person" r:drain="Institution"/> <r:member r:source="Institution" r:drain="http://www.w3.org"/> <r:subscribed r:source="Institution" r:drain="Mailinglist"/> You can actually see this much better with your Rudolf: RDFViz [3] So we were wondering how this can be explained. With kind regards, Jos De Roo --- AGFA [1] ftp://windsor/outgoing/RCEI/NET/euler/index.html [2] ftp://windsor/outgoing/RCEI/NET/euler/authen.rdf [3] http://snowball.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/cgi-bin/rdf-dot/uri2gif?URI=ftp%3A%2F%2Fwindsor% 2Foutgoing%2FRCEI%2FNET%2Feuler%2Fauthen.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2000 11:23:43 UTC