- From: Graham Klyne <GK@dial.pipex.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 14:54:15 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
At 04:20 PM 4/8/00 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote: >So (putting on AI skeptic hat ;-) what I'd love to have now is a set of >practical use case scenarios which show all this logic stuff making itself >useful for real applications (maybe I can annoy the inference/KR folks on >this list into building some more cool demos to shut me up!). I don't know if this qualifies as "real application", since it isn't widely deployed yet... I have an interest in the CC/PP activity to define client capabilities in RDF. I come to this from my work in IETF CONNEG, which takes a far more deterministic approach than generalized RDF to matching client capabilities and document content. RFC 2533 describes a feature description and matching framework that was modelled on (a subset of) Prolog. Following the ideas in <http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Toolbox.html> I would anticipate one could build a similar model, and apply similar matching capabilities, to a client capability framework built in RDF. It's not AI, but I think this is exactly the kind of thing an RDF-linked Prolog engine could be useful for. #g ------------ Graham Klyne (GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Monday, 10 April 2000 11:07:07 UTC