I wonder if the Resource Description Framework is the right place for "encoding spatial information" down to arcs and polygones. I think the complete shape etc. of a geografic object should be the Resource itself, not the description of the Resource. (Conforming to the "Semantic Web"). We handle that in the German Environmental Information Network (www.gein.de) in a different way: in RDF we only use names and ids of geografic objects, referring to a given thesaurus. Thomas Bandholtz - Sema Group GmbH - Project Manager Environmental Information Systems Kaltenbornweg 3 D50679 Cologne GERMANY xx49 221 8299 264 thomas@sema.deReceived on Monday, 20 December 1999 04:35:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:21 UTC