- From: Seaborne, Andy <Andy_Seaborne@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 11:52:55 +0100
- To: "Butler, Mark" <Mark_Butler@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "'www-rdf-dspace@w3.org'" <www-rdf-dspace@w3.org>
Mark,
I prefer the modelling with the explicit accession record (method 2). It
leaves open the possibility of annotating it with other information, like
who/what/when/why like the 'credit' property that Kevin points out.
With both approaches, it is now possible to separate out the Organization
information as it is independent of the record. A separate record of
organizations with the URI (already specified) reduces the size of each work
item record.
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Butler, Mark [mailto:Mark_Butler@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
Sent: 1 September 2003 17:58
To: www-rdf-dspace@w3.org
Subject: Amico Corpus
Hi Team,
I've been looking at the sample Amico data and there is a problem with the
way that owner is encoded
<Paintings rdf:about = "WMAA.70.1650">
<Title>(Self-Portrait)</Title>
<owner>
<Organization rdf:about =
"http://www.amico.org/laf/entities/whitney_museum_of_american_art">
<name>Whitney Museum of American Art</name>
<place>New York, New York, USA</place>
<credit>Josephine N. Hopper Bequest</credit>
<accessionNumber rdf:resource = "70.1650" />
</Organization>
</owner>
</Paintings>
when several of these records are merged, the relationship between the
painting and the accessionNumber is lost, because accessionNumber is a
property of
http://www.amico.org/laf/entities/whitney_museum_of_american_art, not the
painting.
There are two alternative ways of encoding this to avoid this:
<Paintings rdf:about = "WMAA.70.1650">
<Title>(Self-Portrait)</Title>
<owner>
<Owner>
<ownerIdentity>
<Organization rdf:about =
"http://www.amico.org/laf/entities/whitney_museum_of_american_art">
<name>Whitney Museum of American Art</name>
<place>New York, New York, USA</place>
<credit>Josephine N. Hopper Bequest</credit>
</Organization>
</ownerIdentity>
<accessionNumber rdf:resource = "70.1650" />
</Owner>
</owner>
</Paintings>
or alternatively
<Paintings rdf:about = "WMAA.70.1650">
<Title>(Self-Portrait)</Title>
<accessionObject>
<AccessionNumber>
<organization
rdf:resource="http://www.amico.org/laf/entities/whitney_museum_of_american_a
rt"/>
<accessionNumber rdf:resource = "70.1650"/>
</AccessionNumber>
</accessionObject>
<owner>
<Organization rdf:about =
"http://www.amico.org/laf/entities/whitney_museum_of_american_art">
<name>Whitney Museum of American Art</name>
<place>New York, New York, USA</place>
<credit>Josephine N. Hopper Bequest</credit>
</Organization>
</owner>
</Paintings>
Obviously the class and property names (owner, Owner, ownerIdentity and
Organization in the first example and accessionObject, AccessionNumber,
organization and accessionNumber in the second) can be tweaked. Does anybody
have a preference or any other suggestions?
thanks, best regards
Dr Mark H. Butler
Research Scientist HP Labs Bristol
mark-h_butler@hp.com
Internet: http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/marbut/
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2003 06:56:38 UTC