2002-07-26 SIMILE PI Telephone Conference Minutes

Attached are minutes from the SIMILE PI Telephone conference held on
2002-07-26.  These are also available at
http://web.mit.edu/dspace-dev/www/simile/.

Please let me know if I've misrepresented anything, and review open
actions!!

Enjoy,

- Mick

      _________________________________________________________________

                        SIMILE PI Telephone Conference

                        2002-07-26

                        Summary, Actions, and Issues

                        Editor: Mick Bass, HP mailto:bass@alum.mit.edu

         This document:
 
http://web.mit.edu/dspace-dev/www/simile/minutes/minutes-2002-07-26.txt

         Series:
         http://web.mit.edu/dspace-dev/www/simile/minutes/index.html

      _________________________________________________________________


Table of Contents

    Agenda

    Attendees

    Summary

    New Actions / Issues

    Open Actions / Issues

    Closed Actions / Issues

      _________________________________________________________________


Agenda (as revised)

    0. Review agenda

    1. Review open actions & issues.  See
 
<http://web.mit.edu/dspace-dev/www/simile/minutes/minutes-2002-07-11.txt>

	...progress & status ...get a sense for priorities ...confirm
	Aug 14 face to face (reserve others?)

    2. Review recent N-way interactions: kenzie/karger re: cataloging
	workflow bass/karger/kenzie re: RDF history bitstreams
	bass/karger/reynolds/quan re: jena in haystack

    3. Tee up essential offline (independent, 2-way, 3-way) work

    4. New issues & actions Discussion review proposed methodology
        review deliverables in startup phase working process for
        remainder of startup phase use case / demonstrator hone &
        brainstorm

      _________________________________________________________________


Attendees (all via phone)

    David Karger (PI) MIT, LCS / AI Lab Eric Miller (Co-I) W3C Mick
    Bass HP Labs

Not Attending: MacKenzie Smith (Co-I) MIT, Libraries (UK Trip)
      _________________________________________________________________


Summary

The call was consumed by agenda items 1 & 2 (review open actions and
issues, and recent N-way interactions).  Highlights summarized here.

  + IPR Framework

      bass: recent meeting with Pat Greer @ OSP - Pat has set up a
      meeting with MIT attorneys to sift through prior IP
      encumbrances, and their potential impact in this situation.

      karger: Rod Brooks looking into NTT stuff, thinks will work ok

      em: from standpoint of enabling technologies, simplest way
      forward is if everything that we're doing IP-wise is "royalty
      free"

      bass: maybe oxygen can offer a suitable IPR framework

      em: SWAD Europe has IPR framework that may be useful
          (royalty-free and open-source)
	    -> Action Eric (SWAD verbage)
	    -> one-liners wrt IPR positioning leading to royalty-free

  + discussion on each of the following.  see updates below.
	I7 (METS::RDF),
	A9 (sample RDF History data),
	A10 (observe libraries cataloging workflow)

  + August 14 works for next PI face to face meeting in Cambridge
    (karger, bass, em).  bass to confirm with kenzie.

      _________________________________________________________________


NEW Actions (A) / Issues (I)

  ref  owner    summary
  ----|--------|---------
  A20	bass,	clarify DSpace / SIMILE relationship.
	kenzie	Need a statement / context diagram that we can post
publicly.


  A21   em	+ Forward essential terms of SWAD Europe IPR framework,
		  for consideration / applicability in SIMILE environment
		+ Forward helpful one-liners wrt IPR positioning
		  in support of / leading to a royalty-free IPR position.

      _________________________________________________________________


OPEN Actions (A) / Issues (I)	[in rough priority order]

  ref  owner    summary
                --------
                progress / status
  ----|--------|---------

  I11  all,     Strengthen, capture, review: driving/focusing scenarios for
       bass     use, and relationship to methodology phases.

  A8   bass     PI forum for Kenzie to present and all to discuss unmet
		metadata and information interoperability needs from
		MIT Libraries perspective

  A13  all      follow through with requested paperwork to OSP ASAP after
                receiving it.  We need contracts to close by end of July
                if at all possible.
                --------
		July close appears unlikely, yet need to keep process
		moving remains.

  A21   em	+ Forward essential terms of SWAD Europe IPR framework,
		  for consideration / applicability in SIMILE environment
		+ Forward helpful one-liners wrt IPR positioning
		  in support of / leading to a royalty-free IPR position.

  A16  bass     confirm August 14 Cambridge with all PIs
                --------
		works for em and karger.  Mick to confirm with kenzie.

  A20	bass,	clarify DSpace / SIMILE relationship.
	kenzie	Need a statement / context diagram that we can post
publicly.

  A12  all,     Brainstorm, scope, (within available resources), and plan to
                deliver a simple yet compelling demonstrator by end of
                startup phase.

  A9   miller,  gather & distribute to PIs RDF corpuses for
       kenzie, (1) DSpace History and (2) Barton Library Catalog
       bass   
                --------
                tar of RDF history bitstreams in hand.
                need bass/kenzie policy conversation.
		2002-08-14 update: have MIT Libs policy, ready for handoff

  I7   kenzie,  relationship METS :: RDF
       miller
                --------
		em willing to spend energy here.
		mets -> closed world?
		motivation: functionality/capabilities of METS coupled with
		openness, flexibility of RDF.  RDFS for METS?

  A1   karger   summarize test case / requirements on Jena for use in
haystack

		...  re-use cholesterol?
		     but not hardened
		     memory resident only - won't scale

		...  hope jena to get karger team out of database work

		...  root cause between sleepycat/Jena and cholesterol

		...  simple mods to existing Jena DB backends

		action Karger & Bass (serialize) -> profiling

  I2   karger   should cholesterol become an alternative RDB implementation
                for Jena?

  I3   karger   could/should Adenine be bundled with Jena?

  I6   erickson what is CNRI position regarding registration of handle
system
                as a URI scheme with IANA?

      _________________________________________________________________


CLOSED Actions (A) / Issues (I)

  ref  owner    summary
                --------
                resolution
  ----|--------|---------

  A14  bass     followup with Lissa Natkin, LCS
                --------
                met 2002-07-17, communication established and remains open.

  A15  bass     send www-rdf-dspace subscribe instructions to all PIs
                --------
                sent.

  A19  bass     consolidate and make available meeting presentation
materials
                and other useful resources
                --------
                here they are!  also set up SIMILE project web page.

  A17  all      provide non-available times to bass for weekly PI phone call
  A18  bass     identify time for weekly PI phone call
                --------
		Weekly call identified: Fridays at 2pm Eastern.
		May need to revisit after classes resume.

  A4   bass,    followup Quan's "Jena in Haystack" note with Dennis
       karger   and Jena team
                --------
                sent to Jena team

  I5   kenzie,  relationship DSpace Format Registry :: Mime Type open issues
       miller   in W3C Technical Architecture Group
                  - http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#w3cMediaType-1
                  - http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#customMediaType-2
                  - http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#nsMediaType-3
                  - http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#uriMediaType-9
                --------
		close per em, having shared info

  A10  karger,  haystack team pairwise w/ kenzie & library staff to scope
       kenzie	UI reqs for library catalogers / "semantic annotators"
                --------
		Karger update: watched simple "cataloging a book" steps.
                lots of flipping back and forth...
	      
	        idea: haystack UI to present in one place all info needed
		to catalog a book, and allow input of reqd data.

		OCLC data comes back in terminal interface

		No RDF version of MARC
		xml-schema for MARC - but not flattened

		action -> meet reference librarians?  (much harder...)

      _________________________________________________________________


=============================================
Mick Bass


External Engagement Manager
HP Labs / MIT DSpace Program
Hewlett-Packard Company
Building 10-500 MIT, 77 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307


617.253.6617 office    617.452.3000 fax
617.899.3938 mobile    617.627.9694 residence
bass@alum.mit.edu      mick_bass@hp.com
=============================================
 

Received on Thursday, 22 August 2002 15:35:34 UTC