www-rdf-comments@w3.org from January to March 2004 by date

Monday, 29 March 2004

• pls show outstanding dissent on Issue #rdfms-qname-uri-mapping Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 24 March 2004

• Model ships ......diferent conception.....beautiful ! mario zuker

Monday, 22 March 2004

• Re: application/rdf+xml type and assertions Mark Baker
• application/rdf+xml type and assertions Graham Klyne

Saturday, 20 March 2004

• Re: rdf-charmod-uris closed over objection [Fwd: IRI section needs too much testing to go in Fundamentals] Jos De_Roo

Friday, 19 March 2004

• Re: rdf-charmod-uris closed over objection [Fwd: IRI section needs too much testing to go in Fundamentals] Dan Connolly
• Re: rdf-charmod-uris closed over objection [Fwd: IRI section needs too much testing to go in Fundamentals] Brian McBride

Thursday, 18 March 2004

• rdf-charmod-uris closed over objection [Fwd: IRI section needs too much testing to go in Fundamentals] Dan Connolly
• Fw: Re: Media types and assertions Mark Baker

Tuesday, 16 March 2004

• Re: RDF Keys, or why RDF is lousy at metadata annotations Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF Keys, or why RDF is lousy at metadata annotations Brian McBride
• Re: RDF Keys, or why RDF is lousy at metadata annotations Bob MacGregor

Monday, 15 March 2004

• Re: RDF Keys, or why RDF is lousy at metadata annotations Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF Keys, or why RDF is lousy at metadata annotations Frank Manola
• Re: RDF Keys, or why RDF is lousy at metadata annotations Bob MacGregor
• Re: RDF Keys, or why RDF is lousy at metadata annotations Frank Manola

Saturday, 13 March 2004

• RDF Keys, or why RDF is lousy at metadata annotations Bob MacGregor

Friday, 12 March 2004

• Re: Media types and assertions Mark Baker
• Re: Media types and assertions Pat Hayes
• Re: Media types and assertions Mark Baker
• Re: Media types and assertions Pat Hayes
• Re: Media types and assertions Mark Baker
• Re: Media types and assertions Pat Hayes
• Re: Media types and assertions Mark Baker

Thursday, 11 March 2004

• Re: Media types and assertions Graham Klyne
• Re: Media types and assertions Pat Hayes
• Re: Media types and assertions Mark Baker
• Re: Media types and assertions Pat Hayes
• Re: Media types and assertions Mark Baker
• Re: Media types and assertions Graham Klyne
• Media types and assertions Mark Baker

Thursday, 4 March 2004

• away from my office David De Roure

Saturday, 28 February 2004

• CONGRATULATIONS interlottery@iname.com

Saturday, 21 February 2004

• XML-Reference Frank Kaufer

Wednesday, 11 February 2004

• Re: Please Join My group loons fare

Sunday, 8 February 2004

• Please Join My group loons fare

Saturday, 7 February 2004

• PLEASE JOIN MY YAHOO GROUP loons fare

Wednesday, 4 February 2004

• Your legal expertise is very urgently needed! Eric Smith

Saturday, 31 January 2004

• Re: Use cases for relative URIs as namespace names Elliotte Rusty Harold
• Use cases for relative URIs as namespace names Tim Berners-Lee
• PC Shop >

Friday, 30 January 2004

• jeem,ef ,mwef w,gm m,rg ,er jhygyj ujihuijh

Thursday, 29 January 2004

• ¬dµL¦¹¤H gerald.edgar@boeing.com
• Re: RFC 3023 reference in revised syntax PR Dave Beckett

Wednesday, 28 January 2004

• ¬dµL¦¹¤H duerst@w3.org

Sunday, 25 January 2004

• Your Ship Has Come In! This Time You Are Not At The Airport! Will Smith

Tuesday, 20 January 2004

• Please Join My Superb Yahoo Forums! Will Smith
• Re: RDF Primer Comment: Links to Figures and their markup. Frank Manola
• RDF Primer Comment: Links to Figures and their markup. Karl Dubost
• Re: Usage of literals in rdf-primer figure 1 and 5 Frank Manola
• Comment for PR-rdf-syntax-grammar-20031215 Susan Lesch

Monday, 19 January 2004

• Re: Clarification of Reification vs Quotation pat hayes

Saturday, 17 January 2004

• Clarification of Reification vs Quotation Karsten Otto
• old copies of the RDF semantics document now rendered invisible. pat hayes

Friday, 16 January 2004

• RFC 3023 reference in revised syntax PR Mark Baker
• Usage of literals in rdf-primer figure 1 and 5 Chris Bizer

Wednesday, 14 January 2004

• Re: minimizing the textual changes to RDF semantics Brian McBride
• Re: minimizing the textual changes to RDF semantics Brian McBride
• Re: minimizing the textual changes to RDF semantics pat hayes
• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping pat hayes
• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping pat hayes
• minimizing the textual changes to RDF semantics pat hayes
• Re: minimizing the textual changes to RDF semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: minimizing the textual changes to RDF semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections pat hayes
• minimizing the textual changes to RDF semantics pat hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections pat hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections Brian McBride
• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping Jeremy Carroll
• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping Brian McBride
• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections pat hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections pat hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 13 January 2004

• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections pat hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections pat hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections(was: Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL) pat hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections(was: Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL) herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: definition problem?: appending "#foo" without removing "#" from base URI Dave Beckett

Monday, 12 January 2004

• Re: definition problem?: appending "#foo" without removing "#" from base URI Daniel Barclay
• Re: definition problem?: appending "#foo" without removing "#" from base URI Dave Beckett
• definition problem?: appending "#foo" without removing "#" from base URI Daniel Barclay

Thursday, 8 January 2004

• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections(was: Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL) herman.ter.horst@philips.com

Wednesday, 7 January 2004

• { È« º¸ } ±¹Á¦ÀüÈ­ ¹«·áÀÌ¿ë±Ç ¹Þ¾Æ°¡¼¼¿ä...^*^ ±¹Á¦ÀüÈ­ ÄݶóÄÝ

Tuesday, 6 January 2004

• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections(was: Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL) Graham Klyne
• { È« º¸ } ±¹Á¦ÀüÈ­ ¹«·áÀÌ¿ë±Ç ¹Þ¾Æ°¡¼¼¿ä...^*^ ±¹Á¦ÀüÈ­ ÄݶóÄÝ
• RDF Semantics: corrections(was: Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL) pat hayes

Monday, 5 January 2004

• Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL Dan Connolly
• Re: Unresolved issue re media type Brian McBride

Friday, 2 January 2004

• Re: Unresolved issue re media type Brian McBride
• Unresolved issue re media type Mark Baker
• ANN: New book: Rapid Application Development with Mozilla Nigel McFarlane

Last message date: Monday, 29 March 2004 09:22:08 UTC