Tuesday, 30 September 2003
- Re: RDF Semantics: partial review
- Re: proposed closuer of pfps-02, pfps-03 [
- RDF Semantics: partial review
- Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document
- Re: RDFCore issue pfps-12
- proposed closuer of pfps-02, pfps-03 [[was Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document]]
- Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document
- Re: RDFCore issue pfps-12
Monday, 29 September 2003
- Re: comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document
- Re: question about normative status of entailment rules
- Re: question about normative status of entailment rules
- Re: question about normative status of entailment rules
- comments on 26 September version of RDF Semantics document
- question about normative status of entailment rules
Sunday, 28 September 2003
Friday, 26 September 2003
- Re: Please Review: RDFCore WG new specs (2003-11-05), esp. w.r.t. I18N and XMLLiteral
- Re: Please Review: RDFCore WG new specs (2003-11-05), esp. w.r.t. I18N and XMLLiteral
Thursday, 25 September 2003
- rdf:RDF should be optional
- Re: status of comments pfps-02 pfps-03 pfps-04 pfps-05 pfps-06
- Re: XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem
- RE: XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem
- Re: status of comments pfps-02 pfps-03 pfps-04 pfps-05 pfps-06
- status of comments pfps-02 pfps-03 pfps-04 pfps-05 pfps-06
- RE: escaping % in RDF URI references
Wednesday, 24 September 2003
Monday, 22 September 2003
- Re: XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem
- Re: xsd:string ang language tag
- Re: escaping % in RDF URI references
- Re: XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem
- Re: escaping % in RDF URI references
- xsd:string ang language tag
- Re: RDF Schema media type
- Re: RDF Schema media type
- RDF Schema media type
Thursday, 18 September 2003
- Re: OWL CR feedback: owl:Class 'vs' rdfs:Class causing pain. Is owl:Class really needed?
- Re: XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem
- Re: XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem
- Re: XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem
- Re: XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem
- RE: XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem
- Re: OWL CR feedback: owl:Class 'vs' rdfs:Class causing pain. Is owl:Class really needed?
- Re: OWL CR feedback: owl:Class 'vs' rdfs:Class causing pain. Is owl:Class really needed?
- Re: OWL CR feedback: owl:Class 'vs' rdfs:Class causing pain. Is owl:Class really needed?
- Re: OWL CR feedback: owl:Class 'vs' rdfs:Class causing pain. Is owl:Class really needed?
- OWL CR feedback: owl:Class 'vs' rdfs:Class causing pain. Is owl:Class really needed?
Wednesday, 17 September 2003
- Re: proposed closure take 2 Re: proposed closure of Issue pfps-11 (rdfs:comment implies entailments no)
- Re: [Fwd: draft response to pfps re nfc]
- Re: XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem
- [Fwd: draft response to pfps re nfc]
Tuesday, 16 September 2003
- proposed closure take 2 Re: proposed closure of Issue pfps-11 (rdfs:comment implies entailments no)
- Re: proposed closure take 2 Re: proposed closure of Issue pfps-11 (rdfs:comment implies entailments no)
- Re: proposed closure of pfps-12 Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed
- RE: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents
Monday, 15 September 2003
- Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents
- Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents
- Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents
Saturday, 13 September 2003
Friday, 12 September 2003
Tuesday, 9 September 2003
- Re: Omissions, Errors, and Misleading Prose in the N-Triples Specification
- Re: escaping % in RDF URI references
Monday, 8 September 2003
- Guilty? You Decide!
- Re: escaping % in RDF URI references
- Re: Click ... click, clickclick!
- RE: [Gosp_John] John 14 (Many Mansions- III)
Sunday, 7 September 2003
Friday, 5 September 2003
Thursday, 4 September 2003
Friday, 5 September 2003
Wednesday, 3 September 2003
- Re: Inconsistency in N-Triples "language" Production Case
- Inconsistency in N-Triples "language" Production Case
- RE: updated: RDF/XML Media Type registration draft
Tuesday, 2 September 2003
- Re: issues with the 5 Sept version of RDF Semantics
- Re: issues with the 5 Sept version of RDF Semantics
Monday, 1 September 2003
- Re: typo in rdf semantics
- Re: proposed closure of pfps-12 Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed
- typo in rdf semantics
Sunday, 31 August 2003
Saturday, 30 August 2003
Friday, 29 August 2003
- Re: RDF test case on datatypes
- proposed closure of pfps-12 Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed
- Re: RDF test case on datatypes
Thursday, 28 August 2003
- Re: RDF test case on datatypes
- Re: RDF test case on datatypes
- Re: RDF test case on datatypes
- RDF test case on datatypes
Wednesday, 27 August 2003
- Re: continuing technical issues in the RDF Semantics document
- Re: continuing technical issues in the RDF Semantics document
- Re: continuing technical issues in the RDF Semantics document
- Re: continuing technical issues in the RDF Semantics document
- re: updated: RDF/XML Media Type registration draft
Tuesday, 26 August 2003
Saturday, 23 August 2003
Friday, 22 August 2003
- Re: objection to proposed close of pfps-05
- continuing technical issues in the RDF Semantics document
Tuesday, 19 August 2003
Friday, 22 August 2003
Wednesday, 20 August 2003
Tuesday, 19 August 2003
Monday, 18 August 2003
- RelaxNG schema and local names
- Re: RDF model theory is now underspecified
- Re: RDF model theory is now underspecified
- Re: RDF model theory is now underspecified
- Re: RDF model theory is now underspecified
- RDF model theory is now underspecified
Friday, 15 August 2003
- Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization
- Re: dissatisfaction with the entailment rules development
- Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization
- Re: objection to proposed close of pfps-05
Thursday, 14 August 2003
- 3store RDF(S) server implementation report
- Re: problems with simple entailment rules
- Re: [proposed closing: pfps-04]
- objection to proposed close of pfps-05
- Re: [proposed close: pfps-05]
- Re: [proposed close: pfps-05]
Wednesday, 13 August 2003
Tuesday, 12 August 2003
- Re: support XML Literals in RDF
- Re: pfps-15 say anything quote
- Re: support XML Literals in RDF
- Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization
Monday, 11 August 2003
Sunday, 10 August 2003
- Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization
- [closed] pfps-15 say anything quote
- Re: [proposed close: pfps-05]
Thursday, 7 August 2003
- Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization
- [closed] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"
Sunday, 10 August 2003
- [proposed close: pfps-05]
- [proposed closing: pfps-04]
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: problems with simple entailment rules
Friday, 8 August 2003
- Re: support XML Literals in RDF
- Re: pfps-15 say anything quote
- Re: pfps-15 say anything quote
- Multilingual text in Schema doc
- Re: support XML Literals in RDF
- Re: problems with simple entailment rules
- Re: problems with simple entailment rules
- Re: pfps-15 say anything quote
Thursday, 7 August 2003
- Re: pfps-15 say anything quote
- Re: pfps-15 say anything quote
- Re: pfps-15 say anything quote
- updated: RDF/XML Media Type registration draft
- Re: pfps-15 say anything quote
- Re: support XML Literals in RDF
- Re: support XML Literals in RDF
- Re: support XML Literals in RDF
- Re: support XML Literals in RDF
- XML literals, canonical form, and normal form C problem
- implementation report: Sesame and the RDF specs
- Re: problems with simple entailment rules
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: support XML Literals in RDF
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: mismatch between test and RDF/XML syntax
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: support XML Literals in RDF
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: mismatch between test and RDF/XML syntax
- Re: support XML Literals in RDF (was Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization)
- support XML Literals in RDF (was Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization)
- Re: mismatch between test and RDF/XML syntax
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
Wednesday, 6 August 2003
- Re: pfps-15 say anything quote
- Re: pfps-15 say anything quote
- Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: status of RDF tests
- Re: status of RDF tests
Tuesday, 5 August 2003
- mismatch between test and RDF/XML syntax
- status of RDF tests
- Re: dissatisfaction with the entailment rules development
- Re: [resolution]pfps-04; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules
- Re: review of July 15 draft of RDF Semantics document
- Re: problems with simple entailment rules
- Re: Entailment rules development suggestion
- Re: [closing?] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"
- Re: review of July 15 draft of RDF Semantics document
- Re: [resolution]pfps-04; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules
- [closed] Re: base url for rdf test cases
- Re: base url for rdf test cases
- Re: base url for rdf test cases
- base url for rdf test cases
Monday, 4 August 2003
- Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization
- Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization
- Re: dissatisfaction with the entailment rules development
- Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization
- Sesame compliance with RDF Test Cases of August 1
- Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization
Sunday, 3 August 2003
- Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization
- Re: [closed] Issue horrocks-01 rdfs:comment semantics
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: dissatisfaction with the entailment rules development
- dissatisfaction with the entailment rules development
- problems with simple entailment rules
Friday, 1 August 2003
- Re: pfps-05 RDFS closure rules [not complete yet]
- Re: An rdfs:Schema Class
- Re: What is RDF Schema? [proposed closed]
- Re: What is RDF Schema? [proposed closed]
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: What is RDF Schema? [proposed closed]
- Re: What is RDF Schema? [proposed closed]
- Re: What is RDF Schema? [proposed closed]
- Re: rdfs:member
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: What is RDF Schema? [proposed closed]
- Re: What is RDF Schema? [proposed closed]
- rdfs:member
- Re: What is RDF Schema? [proposed closed]
- Re: [postponed] Qu-03
- Re: unsubscribe dhump3@hotmail.com
Thursday, 31 July 2003
- Re: pfps-05 RDFS closure rules [not complete yet]
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: pfps-05 RDFS closure rules [not complete yet]
- Re: pfps-04 [RDF entailment rules not yet complete]
- Re: pfps-04 [RDF entailment rules not yet complete]
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- comments on the use of normal form C
- [postponed] Qu-03
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Re: Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Test case regarding XML Literals and octets
- Fwd: test case results needed...
- Re: pfps-04 [RDF entailment rules not yet complete]
- Re: pfps-04 [RDF entailment rules not yet complete]
- Re: pfps-04 [RDF entailment rules not yet complete]
- Re: pfps-04 [RDF entailment rules not yet complete]
- Re: pfps-04 [RDF entailment rules not yet complete]
- Re: pfps-04 [RDF entailment rules not yet complete]
- Re: An rdfs:Schema Class
- Re: [closed] Issue horrocks-01 rdfs:comment semantics
- Re: add a triviallyTrue predicate (proposal to close LC issue danc-04)
- Re: pfps-04 [RDF entailment rules not yet complete]
- Re: pfps-05 RDFS closure rules [not complete yet]
Wednesday, 30 July 2003
- Re: [closed] horst-01; was: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma
- Re: pfps-15 say anything quote
- Re: semantics update
- Re: pfps-15 say anything quote
- Re: danc-01rdf/xml reification examples
- rdf:dataType="&rdf;XMLLiteral" (was: Re: first pass parseType="Literal" text for primer)
- Re: danc-03 rdf/xml reification examples
- pfps-15 say anything quote
- Re: pfps-15 say anything quote
- danc-01rdf/xml reification examples
- Re: semantics update
- Re: semantics update
- RDF test case rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf erroneously approved?
- Re: semantics update
- Re: [closed] re: Pan-01
Tuesday, 29 July 2003
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: [closed] re: Pan-01
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- [closing?] pfps-14 "Social Meaning and RDF"
- [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Raptor 0.9.11 passes all parser tests
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: review of July 15 draft of RDF Semantics document
- Re: semantics update
- Re: review of July 15 draft of RDF Semantics document
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: [closed] re: Pan-01
Monday, 28 July 2003
- Re: [closed] re: Pan-01
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-05 RDFS closure rules
- Re: pfps-05 RDFS closure rules
- Re: pfps-05 RDFS closure rules
- Re: pfps-07 typed literals with lang tags
- Re: pfps-10 untyped literals
- pfps-10 untyped literals
- Re: pfps-07 typed literals with lang tags
- pfps-07 typed literals with lang tags
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
Sunday, 27 July 2003
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
Saturday, 26 July 2003
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
Friday, 25 July 2003
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04
- Impact of working group changes
- Jena semantic tests
- ARP passes all parser tests
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-04
Thursday, 24 July 2003
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-09
- Re: pfps-04
- pfps-09
- for review: RDF/XML Media Type registration draft
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: Bug in 'RDF-Primer'
- Bug in 'RDF-Primer'
- Re: review of July 15 draft of RDF Semantics document
- Re: review of July 15 draft of RDF Semantics document
Wednesday, 23 July 2003
- Re: pfps-04
- review of July 15 draft of RDF Semantics document
- Re: pfps-08
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-02
- Re: pfps-06
- Re: pfps-04
- Re: pfps-02
- Re: pfps-01
Tuesday, 22 July 2003
Monday, 21 July 2003
Thursday, 17 July 2003
Wednesday, 16 July 2003
Tuesday, 15 July 2003
Monday, 14 July 2003
Friday, 11 July 2003
- [closed] re: Pan-01
- Re: tex-01 case of language tag [was RDF Concepts document Jan 23, lang comments]
Tuesday, 8 July 2003
- RDFCore responses to XML Schema last call comments on RDF docs
- RE: possible peculiarity with empty datatypes
- RE: possible peculiarity with empty datatypes
- Re: possible peculiarity with empty datatypes
Monday, 7 July 2003
- [closed] xmlsch-03
- [closed] xmlsch-04
- [closed] xmlsch-06
- [closed] xmlsch-05
- [closed] xmlsch-02
- [closed] xmlsch-01
Friday, 4 July 2003
Thursday, 3 July 2003
- Re: [resolution]pfps-02; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning Lbase translation of XML Literals
- Re: [resolution]pfps-02; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning Lbase translation of XML Literals
- Re: [resolution]pfps-09; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning datatypes
- Re: [resolution]pfps-04; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules
- [resolution]pfps-02; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning Lbase translation of XML Literals
- [resolution]pfps-09; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning datatypes
Wednesday, 2 July 2003
- [resolution]pfps-04; was: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning RDF closure rules
- [closed] horst-01; was: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma
- RE: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files''
- Re: RDF XMLLiterals reagle-01,-02
- RDF XMLLiterals reagle-01,-02
- Proposal to close horst-01
Tuesday, 1 July 2003
- Re: [notclosed] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: [closed] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- Re: [closed] pfps-16, "What is the expressive power of RDF?"
- Re: [closed] pfps-13, "What is a datatype in RDF?"
- [closed] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
- [closed] pfps-16, "What is the expressive power of RDF?"
- [closed] pfps-13, "What is a datatype in RDF?"
- [closed] pfps-13, "What is a datatype in RDF?"