- From: <HEPWORTH@mutual.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 96 17:27:35
- To: www-rdb@w3.org
Although the "In Process" extensions are efficient, I believe there is a fundamental flaw in this architecture. Once an extension is loaded into the server's address space there is a real danger that a failure within the extension could cause the server's memory space to become corrupt, crashing the server. It's the old trade off between speed and stability. Al > I've heard alot about the advantages of products that work "in process" and tal k directly to NSAPI and ISAPI vs "out of process i.e.: CGI > scripts" > > My opinion is that CGI/Perl is "old school" and that the future of client/serve r www functionality is clearly based on in-process middleware > solutions. > > Hope this sparks some discussion. > > Steve > > > -------------------------------------------------------- > Technology Briefings Client/Server Solutions > > T/SA L t d. > > Information Architecture WWW + Database Integration > > tsaltd@panix.com > (212) 343-0209 > --------------------------------------------------------- > >
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 1996 13:10:15 UTC