- From: Steve A. Olson <solson@cst.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 13:33:49 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-rdb@w3.org
The db approach also gives you the ability to "author" the pages using any client-server database package (even remotely) to update the content without messing around with any files at all. > |=20 > | Gee, do you actually want to put regular HTML pages into a database as > | objects, even if they just contain static text? I've been asking > | people about this, and haven't heard much interest in it, so I'm > | curious what you feel would be the benefits ot such an approach. > > Yes, I do. My reason for wanting to do this is that if I am providing > a single `page' in several formats, e.g. Lynx-compatible, Mosaic, > Mozilla, and several different languages, I don't want to have to deal > with umpteen files. If everything is encapsulated in one place, and I > can just say `display yourself' to this object, life suddenly becomes > easier. My idea is to treat it much like a C++ class, and derive > classes with more complex behaviour from a basic page object, which I > envisage resembling a normal HTML page in appearance, but with the > ability to add another language version to itself when requested - > some sort of admin tool would check out the text for a language (=E0 la > SCCS/RCS) and check it back in. The page object would also be able to > do integrity checking, by maintaining pointers to other page objects, > and creating links to whatever they happen to be called on the fly. > Moving things around within the web hierarchy then becomes easier as > well, almost as a side-effect. ---A-I-T--------------------------------- Applied Information Technologies, Inc. URL: http://www.sqlweb.com/ Steve A. Olson Vice President 410-796-5862 (Voice) 410-917-4171 (Celluar) 410-379-2202 (FAX) Steve.Olson@cst.com (Internet)
Received on Thursday, 18 January 1996 13:34:06 UTC