- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:39:58 +0900
- To: Hal Goodtree <hal@online-copywriter.com>
- Cc: <www-qa@w3.org>
Hi Hal. On May 11, 2007, at 06:08 , Hal Goodtree wrote: > The previously referenced example: > http://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/noClickHere > > is in need of update I believe. Based on the responses to my blog > post, verbs are no longer verboten as linking text. Thanks for looking into this tip. There are good ideas in what you wrote, and what people added as comments. I would probably not be so peremptory in saying that a few opinions make something "no longer verboten", but I do agree that the original sentence: [[ we do not recommend putting verb phrases in link text ]] is too strong. The point of the tip is to recommend meaningful links, and I guess verbs can be OK, especially if the link points to some kind of action. e.g I wouldn't consider _Read More_ a particularly good link, whereas _contact bob_ (with a mailto link for instance) or _download the latest version_ looks just fine to me. A rewrite of the tip to focus more on this, and removing the arguable rule about verbs would be good. If you want to suggest rewordings, please feel free. > The WCAG is a wonderful resource, but it is too technically > oriented for the average copywriter. I don't see anything particularly wrong or outdated in the Link text section in http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/#link-text (which the tip refers to as further reading). It recommends clearly identifying the target and avoiding vague text links such as "click here", which is fine, no? -- olivier
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2007 02:39:50 UTC