- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:06:45 +0100
- To: "RDFa" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- Cc: "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, <www-qa@w3.org>
All, To enable a smooth and reliable process regarding the handling of RDFa TC, I'd like to suggest the following: 1. We (RDFa-TF) define the role of a 'TC responsible' (TCR) that is the process owner for all TC-related issues 2. In case a (not yet covered) feature is expected to be tested, anyone may send a mail with a short description to either: + this list (public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org) using [RDFa-TC] as a prefix OR + public-rdfa-test@w3.org (yet to be established) We should agree on ONE of the two options :) 3. The TCR is then responsible for ... + raising an according issue (in Tracker), and + getting the new TC onto the next telecon's agenda for discussion 4. The fallback for the TCR is the TF chair. Even though this might sound like a bit of an overkill, IMHO it is a good thing to define at least an ideal process that we can refer to and people know what to expect. I'd be _very_ happy if we can agree on this process (or an adapted version) ASAP, to start doing so; cf. for example DanC's request w.r.t. TC [1]. Note: w3.org seems to be down at the time writing, so please be lenient towards me that I did not include references as usual ... Cheers, Michael BTW: I volunteer to initially fill the TCR role ;) [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000002.htm ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA <office> phone: +43-316-876-1193 (fax:-1191) e-mail: michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at web: http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ <private> mobile: +43-660-7621761 web: http://www.sw-app.org/ ----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2007 09:02:05 UTC