- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 20:03:12 -0500
- To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, www-qa@w3.org
Hausenblas, Michael wrote: > All, > > After some discussion and some contemplation [1] and [2], > I'd like to propose the following resolutions w.r.t. the > RDFa Test Suite: > > 1. We avoid the term 'conformance testing' at all > (the former CQ is now called Test Query); > That suits my preference, thanks. I have to admit my case is less than compelling. The meaning of the term seems to have drifted since I learned it, or something. > Comments welcome; hope DanC can agree ;) > Again, all of this infrastructure stuff is well and good, I guess, but what I want most is a handful of fairly complete tests; preferably tests based on examples that are being advertised widely, e.g. those in the primer. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2007 01:03:03 UTC