- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 04:17:37 +0100
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
* Karl Dubost wrote: >The link will never break if the link is made to the dated version, >but might be outdated if a future version is released. The way we do >now is a double link for global references (which doesn't solve your >issue but might lead us to a best practice.) > >Example: > > XML10 > Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Third > Edition), E. Maler, J. Paoli, F. Yergeau, T. Bray, C. M. > Sperberg-McQueen, Editors, W3C Recommendation, 4 February > 2004, > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-20040204/ . > Latest version available at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/ > . But what does it mean for "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/" to be the latest version of "http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-20040204/"? Is a XML 2.0 Working Draft the "Latest version" of the XML 1.0 REC? It might sound silly, but see <http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-events/>. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2007 03:17:54 UTC